2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.08.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Periodic autoregressive forecasting of global solar irradiation without knowledge-based model implementation

Abstract: Reliable forecasting methods increase the integration level of stochastic production and reduce cost of intermittence of photovoltaic production. This paper proposes a solar forecasting model for short time horizons, i.e. one to six hours ahead. In this time-range, machine learning methods have proven their efficiency. But their application requires that the solar irradiation time series is stationary which can be realized by calculating the clear sky global horizontal solar irradiance index (CSI), depending o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to remember that the goal of the predictive methodologies described and tested here is not to be the best forecasting models, but the simplest ones (sometimes very simple) that would allow arbitration of the classification of more complex models. For example, forecasts made with artificial neural networks of the multilayer perceptron type on this data set are slightly less than 20% for 1-h horizon [40] but are too complex to be used as reference.…”
Section: Specific Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to remember that the goal of the predictive methodologies described and tested here is not to be the best forecasting models, but the simplest ones (sometimes very simple) that would allow arbitration of the classification of more complex models. For example, forecasts made with artificial neural networks of the multilayer perceptron type on this data set are slightly less than 20% for 1-h horizon [40] but are too complex to be used as reference.…”
Section: Specific Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the ( ) model developed in this study was assessed using the mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error, coefficient of determination (R 2 ), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and Akaike's information criterion (AIC) as expressed in Equations ( 5) to (9). Several studies used ( ) techniques to evaluate the global solar radiation [17]- [20], total ozone content [21] and ocean current [22]. The method was found to predict the variables very well with great accuracy compared to ground measurement. )…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Ar(p) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also includes a fruitful discussion on nonstandard analysis. 2 Persistence and scaled, or smart, persistence are quite often discussed elsewhere in the literature, essentially perhaps in meteorology (see, e.g., [49], [50]) and climatology (see, e.g., [38]). 3 For the estimation techniques, see also [22], [44], and [36] for more mathematical details.…”
Section: B Three Forecasting Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%