Performances of the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA), and validity of timing components in comparison with three commonly used agility tests in Chinese boys: an exploratory study

Abstract

Background The practical application of the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA) has been reported in some Western countries. However, a few studies reported the application of the CAMSA in Chinese children. In addition, given that the CAMSA was designing to incorporate both movement skills and agility assessment, the value and validity of the timing component of the CAMSA are worth discussing. Methods By choosing the Illinois Agility Test, Repeated Side Step-1 m distance, and the newly designed Repeated Side Step-half of height as the benchmark, we evaluate the performance of the CAMSA, further establish the concurrent validity of the CAMSA timing components (completion time and time score). In total, 149 male children (mean age 9.0 ± 0.8 years) from public schools in Shanghai, China, participated in the study. Results The mean CAMSA completion time was 19.3 ± 5.3 (s), and mean time score was 8.7 ± 3.9 (range of 1–14) for all participants (n = 149). After adjusted the sprint speed, older age was positively associated with the performance of the CAMSA. Being overweight was not associated with the performance of the CAMSA comparing with healthy body mass children, however, being obese was negatively associated with the CAMSA timing components and total score. Children having extracurricular sports activities (e.g., athletic experiences), mostly soccer, were more likely to demonstrated better performances of the CAMSA completion time, time score and total score. However, overweight and obese, also athletic experiences were not significantly contributed to the CAMSA skill score, although the association was slight (Adj R2 = 0.13). Besides, the CAMSA completion time has a strong correlation with the IAT, r = 0.77; RSS-1MD, r = − 0.76; and RSS-HHD, r = − 0.77, p < 0.01. The same pattern of correlation was also found between the CAMSA time score and three agility tests: IAT, r = − 0.79; RSS-1MD, r = 0.76; RSS-HHD, r = 0.78, p < 0.01. Discussion Overall, a few participants in the study were able to reach the recommended level of the total CAMSA score referring to the Canadian criterion. The strong concurrent validity was found between the CAMSA timing components and three selected agility tests, respectively.

Parental and Peer Support Matters: A Broad Umbrella of the Role of Perceived Social Support in the Association between Children’s Perceived Motor Competence and Physical Activity

“…CAMSA score was calculated as the mean average of the two assessment trials. This assessment showed moderate-to-excellent inter- and intra-rater, and test–retest reliability in Canadian [ 38 ], Chinese [ 39 ], and Greek children [ 40 ]. Within this study sample, moderate-to-excellent test–retest intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) for time scores (ICC = 0.83, 95% CI (0.76, 0.88)), item scores (ICC = 0.70, 95% CI (0.58, 0.79)), and total CAMSA scores (ICC = 0.82, 95% CI (0.75, 0.87)) were found among 69 participants.…”

Measurement Properties of Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment for Children Aged 9–12 Years Using Rasch Analysis

“…Since then, the CAMSA has been widely and concurrently used as a critical component of the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy (CAPL) ( 18 ). The Children's Physical Literacy Assessment application showed that the CAMSA assessment results were similar to real sport situations ( 19 ).…”

“…Numerous studies from Canada ( 20 ), Australia ( 2 ), the Netherlands ( 21 ), the United Kingdom ( 22 ), South Africa ( 23 ), and China ( 19 ) have explored the measurement properties of the CAMSA instrument. However, validity of the CAMSA test has only been reported in three studies to date (except the CAMSA development team) ( 2 , 19 , 20 ).…”

“…Numerous studies from Canada ( 20 ), Australia ( 2 ), the Netherlands ( 21 ), the United Kingdom ( 22 ), South Africa ( 23 ), and China ( 19 ) have explored the measurement properties of the CAMSA instrument. However, validity of the CAMSA test has only been reported in three studies to date (except the CAMSA development team) ( 2 , 19 , 20 ). Of these, Lander et al showed that CAMSA skill scores had good concurrent validity ( r s = 0.68) and inter-rater retest reliability (ICC = 0.85) in an Australian study of early adolescent girls ( 2 ).…”

“…A study by Stearns et al revealed moderate to large correlations between PLAYfun and CAMSA ( r = 0.47–0.60) ( 20 ). Furthermore, another study from a sample of Chinese male children explored the validity of the CAMSA timing test in comparison to three commonly used agility tests ( 19 ).…”