2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance studies of multilayer hard surface coatings (TiN/TiCN/Al2O3/TiN) of indexable carbide inserts in hard machining: Part-I (An experimental approach)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface roughness was maximum in the uncoated cutting tool because of its rough surface morphology and porous microstructure. [37][38][39][40][41] The responsible factors for the input parameters based on the S=N ratios and the con¯rmation experimental results for the surface roughness are shown in Table 13.…”
Section: Cutting Force Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface roughness was maximum in the uncoated cutting tool because of its rough surface morphology and porous microstructure. [37][38][39][40][41] The responsible factors for the input parameters based on the S=N ratios and the con¯rmation experimental results for the surface roughness are shown in Table 13.…”
Section: Cutting Force Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because surface roughness affects several functional attributes such as corrosion resistance, tribological characteristics, fatigue strength, and wear resistance of machined components, various researchers have employed methods which includes experimental, statistical, and analytical approaches in hard turning operation with various workpiece materials [18CrMo4, 42CrMo4, SEA8620, AISI 1040, 1045 for modeling and optimization using response surface methodology (RSM) (Elbah et al 2013;Hessainia et al 2013;Shihab et al 2014;Azam et al 2015;Meddour et al 2015;Bouzid et al 2015), Taguchi method (Gunay and Yucel 2013;Rashid et al 2016;Zerti et al 2016;Panda et al 2016;Das et al 2017a), ANN (Asiltürk and Çunkaş 2011;Pontes et al 2012;Asiltürk 2012;Mia and Dhar 2016), GRA (Sahoo and Sahoo 2013a;Kacal and Yildirim 2012;Senthilkumar et al 2014), GA (Batish et al 2014;Bouacha and Terrab 2016), and particle swarm optimization (PSO) (Stryczek and Pytlak 2014;Yue et al 2016) to attain the surface quality and dimensional finishing condition similar to costly cylindrical grinding. For example, Hessainia et al (2015) found that response surface methodology represents a powerful approach and can offer to scientific researchers as well industrial metal workers a helpful optimization procedure for various combinations of the workpiece and the cut material tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flank wear evolution ranges from 0.06 to 0.098 mm respectively. However it increases at slightly higher rate at higher cutting speed and feed of 190 m/min and 0.16 mm/rev respectively and reaches 0.155 mm (at run 4) but still within the limiting range of tool wear of 0.3 mm [20,29,30,31].The cutting inserts are free from any types of failures such as chipping, fracturing, and adhesion and induced regular flank wear with stable machining. Similar observations are noticed at depth of cut of 0.2mm (Run 5, 6, 7, 8), 0.3mm (Run 9, 10, 11 and 12) and 0.4mm (Run 13, 14, 15 and 16) respectively.…”
Section: Analysis Of Flank Wearmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The measured surface roughness varies from 0.2 microns to 1.33 microns respectively which is below the criterion limit of 1.6 microns. [20,29,30,31] This justifies its implementation in hard turning as surface roughness values are comparable to traditional grinding operation and may be replaced.…”
Section: Analysis Of Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation