Abstract:This study explores the influence of sideout failure on performance in the next sideout in beach volleyball. The sample comprises 965 elite matches in the FIVB World Series 2012–2016 and in the Olympic Games 2012/2016 including 28,974 sideout sequences (12,755 for men and 16,219 for women). A sideout sequence consists of two sideouts by the same player during the same set in a timeframe of four rallies. The first sideout in this sequence is referred to as the previous sideout and the second sideout as the next… Show more
“…Negative feedback (e.g., perceived errors) may provide a stronger input to subsequent performance expectancies than positive feedback (e.g., hot streaks). This interpretation is supported by recent data in volleyball decision making (Link & Wenninger, 2019) and the work of Baumeister and colleagues, who intimated that "bad is stronger than good", as a general principle across a broad range of psychological phenomena (Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Finkenauer, & Vohs, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Dependence reflects the belief that the probability of success on one play is influenced by previous plays and is most frequently associated with research examining performance streaks; colloquially referred to as the hot hand effect (e.g., Bar-Eli, Avugos, & Raab, 2006;Wetzels et al, 2016). However, interpreting negative performance feedback (e.g., an error) as evidence that more mistakes are likely, would also reflect dependence (e.g., Link & Wenninger, 2019). To summarize, ACTS predicts that when both the perceived cost of failure (influenced by fluctuations in the current level of pressure) and perceived probability of failure (influenced by previous unsuccessful performance feedback) are high, the interactive effect will lead to heightened anxiety, impaired attentional control and negative consequences for performance (as summarized in Figure 1).…”
Background and Objectives: While the potentially negative effects of pressure on skilled performance have been well studied in laboratory-based research, theoretically driven questions based on real-world performance data are lacking. Design: We aimed to test the predictions of the newly developed Attentional Control Theory: Sport (ACTS), using archived play-by-play data from the past seven seasons of the National Football League (American Football). Methods: An additive scoring system was developed to characterize the degree of pressure on 212,356 individual offensive plays and a Bayesian regression model was used to test the relationship between performance, pressure and preceding negative outcomes, as outlined in ACTS. Results: There was found to be a clear increase in the incidence of failures on high pressure plays (odds ratio = 1.20), and on plays immediately following a previous play failure (odds ratio = 1.09). Additionally, a combined interactive effect of previous failure and pressure indicated that the feedback effect of negative outcomes was greater when pressure was already high (odds ratio = 1.10), in line with the predictions of ACTS. Conclusions: These findings reveal the importance of exploring momentary changes in pressure in real-world sport settings, and the role of failure feedback in influencing the pressure-performance relationship.
“…Negative feedback (e.g., perceived errors) may provide a stronger input to subsequent performance expectancies than positive feedback (e.g., hot streaks). This interpretation is supported by recent data in volleyball decision making (Link & Wenninger, 2019) and the work of Baumeister and colleagues, who intimated that "bad is stronger than good", as a general principle across a broad range of psychological phenomena (Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Finkenauer, & Vohs, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Dependence reflects the belief that the probability of success on one play is influenced by previous plays and is most frequently associated with research examining performance streaks; colloquially referred to as the hot hand effect (e.g., Bar-Eli, Avugos, & Raab, 2006;Wetzels et al, 2016). However, interpreting negative performance feedback (e.g., an error) as evidence that more mistakes are likely, would also reflect dependence (e.g., Link & Wenninger, 2019). To summarize, ACTS predicts that when both the perceived cost of failure (influenced by fluctuations in the current level of pressure) and perceived probability of failure (influenced by previous unsuccessful performance feedback) are high, the interactive effect will lead to heightened anxiety, impaired attentional control and negative consequences for performance (as summarized in Figure 1).…”
Background and Objectives: While the potentially negative effects of pressure on skilled performance have been well studied in laboratory-based research, theoretically driven questions based on real-world performance data are lacking. Design: We aimed to test the predictions of the newly developed Attentional Control Theory: Sport (ACTS), using archived play-by-play data from the past seven seasons of the National Football League (American Football). Methods: An additive scoring system was developed to characterize the degree of pressure on 212,356 individual offensive plays and a Bayesian regression model was used to test the relationship between performance, pressure and preceding negative outcomes, as outlined in ACTS. Results: There was found to be a clear increase in the incidence of failures on high pressure plays (odds ratio = 1.20), and on plays immediately following a previous play failure (odds ratio = 1.09). Additionally, a combined interactive effect of previous failure and pressure indicated that the feedback effect of negative outcomes was greater when pressure was already high (odds ratio = 1.10), in line with the predictions of ACTS. Conclusions: These findings reveal the importance of exploring momentary changes in pressure in real-world sport settings, and the role of failure feedback in influencing the pressure-performance relationship.
“…The standard deviation observed in the distance covered in our study might reflect sets debated between more unbalanced teams [7]. Female BV is characterized by longer rallies than for male BV [22,23], which could highlight the total distance covered and Player Load. Addition-ally, variables that depend on total distance to express different levels of intensity (displacement walking, jogging and running, acceleration, deceleration, and jumps) should not be used to compare players, sets or studies unless they are expressed by the percentage of the total distance, acceleration, deceleration, and fly-time (jumps).…”
The aim of this study was to quantify the physical demands of female beach volleyball competition with reference to player position, set, and match outcome. Twelve professional players were equipped with a 10 Hz GPS device (Minimax S4, Catapult Sports, Australia). Data collection occurred over 30 official matches, with a total of 50 sets. GPS output variables were related to position (e.g., Defenders and Blockers). Differences between players’ positions were found in Peak Player Load, the distance covered at different intensities, and acceleration and deceleration. Variations during the match were more pronounced for Defenders than for Blockers, with the former increasing the intensity of acceleration and deceleration, and decreasing the velocity of displacements and lower jumps. For Blockers, main variations occurred between the first and second set, with a reduction in velocity displacements and an increase in the intensity of jumps. Defender variables that contributed to victory were high deceleration, velocity, acceleration, and Peak Player Load. The characteristics of Blockers that contributed to victory were maximum velocity and high jumps. Female beach volleyball players seem to have different physiological requirements according to their position. The analysis of these variations throughout the game suggests that a specific player’s position output may be determined by proper and/or opponent tactical schemes.
“…A miss does not imply that the sideout team did not win the rally, since there is still the possibility of defending the counterattack and scoring. The performance variables selected are standard in scouting reports (Link & Wenninger, 2019).…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data were annotated by professional beach volleyball analysts using custom-made observation software for use with video recordings (Link, 2014). The data are part of a more detailed data set that was used to prepare Germany's national teams for their competitions and has already been used in other publications (Link & Wenninger, 2019;Wenninger et al, 2020). Cohen's kappa statistics show substantial to perfect agreement between two observers for the variables selected player and outcome based on a subset of 130 sideouts (κ = .94 to 1.0).…”
Human behavior is often assumed to be irrational, full of errors, and affected by cognitive biases. One of these biases is base-rate neglect, which happens when the base rates of a specific category are not considered when making decisions. We argue here that while naïve subjects demonstrate base-rate neglect in laboratory conditions, experts tested in the real world do use base rates. Our explanation is that lab studies use single questions, whereas, in the real world, most decisions are sequential in nature, leading to a more realistic test of base-rate use. One decision that lends itself to testing base-rate use in real life occurs in beach volleyball—specifically, deciding to whom to serve to win the game. Analyzing the sequential choices in expert athletes in more than 1,300 games revealed that they were sensitive to base rates and adapted their decision strategies to the performance of the opponent. Our data describes a threshold at which players change their strategy and use base rates. We conclude that the debate over whether decision makers use base rates should be shifted to real-world tests, and the focus should be on when and how base rates are used.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.