Performance standards and meat safety — Developments and direction

Jenson, Ian; Sumner, John

doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.015

Cited by 21 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…42 Measures to improve control of the contamination of beef with Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other enteric pathogens have been implemented in many countries. 43 It appears that measures effective for control of pathogens are also enhancing control over contamination of beef with organisms responsible for spoilage of the vacuum-packaged product.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Australian beef carcasses are not subjected to decontaminating treatments; but in recent years the Australian industry has developed a variety of other practices to improve the microbiological safety of their products . Measures to improve control of the contamination of beef with Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other enteric pathogens have been implemented in many countries . It appears that measures effective for control of pathogens are also enhancing control over contamination of beef with organisms responsible for spoilage of the vacuum‐packaged product.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Storage life at 2 °C or −1.5 °C of vacuum‐packaged boneless and bone‐in cuts from decontaminated beef carcasses

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Storage life at 2 °C or −1.5 °C of vacuum‐packaged boneless and bone‐in cuts from decontaminated beef carcasses

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Ultimately, a food integrity management system comprising of HACCP, VACCP and TACCP is crucial to help the industry assign countermeasures which protect food safety, quality, authenticity and security issues and achieve consumer trust in the food industry (Kleboth et al 2016;Jenson and Sumner 2012;Jevsnik et al 2008;Papademas and Bintsis 2010;Powell et al 2013;Ramsingh 2014). Recently, Kleboth et al (2016) carried out a similar review of the food fraud literature.…”

Section: Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The seafood supply chain from a fraudulent perspective

Mitchell²,

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Food fraud is an intentional act for economic gain. It poses a risk to food integrity, the economy, public health and consumers' ethics. Seafood is one commodity which has endured extensive fraudulent activity owing to its increasing consumer demand, resource limitations, high value and complex supply chains. It is essential that these fraudulent opportunities are revealed, the risk is evaluated and countermeasures for mitigation are assigned. This can be achieved through mapping of the seafood supply chains and identifying the vulnerability analysis critical control points (VACCP), which can be exposed, infiltrated and exploited for fraudulent activity. This research systematically maps the seafood supply chain for three key commodities: finfish, shellfish and crustaceans in the United Kingdom. Each chain is comprised of multiple stakeholders across numerous countries producing a diverse range of products distributed globally. For each supply chain the prospect of fraud, with reference to species substitution, fishery substitution, illegal, unreported and unregulated substitution, species adulteration, chain of custody abuse, catch method fraud, undeclared product extension, modern day slavery and animal welfare, has been identified and evaluated. This mapping of the fraudulent opportunities within the supply chains provides a foundation to rank known and emerging risks and to develop a proactive mitigation plan which assigns control measures and responsibility where vulnerabilities exist. Further intelligence gathering and management of VACCPs of the seafood supply chains may deter currently unknown or unexposed fraudulent opportunities.

show abstract

“…The output of a QMRA can be used to quantify a FSO and Crouch, LaBarre, Golden, Kause, and Dearfield (2009), Zwietering, Stewart, and Whiting (2010) , and Whiting (2011) have published examples on the conversion of a QMRA output into a FSO. A food business operator would use this FSO as a guide for assuring the food safety requirement of their products by taking into account the initial contamination, reductions through inactivation steps, potential recontamination, and possible growth before the food is consumed ( Gorris, Bassett & Membré, 2006; Gorris & Yoe, 2014; Jenson & Sumner, 2012 ). This risk-based approach allows greater flexibility in assuring food safety depending on the nature of the food and the choice of hazard control measures available to the food business operator.…”

Section: Future Of Qmra In Chinamentioning

confidence: 99%

Status and future of Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment in China

Dong

Barker

Gorris

et al. 2015

Trends in Food Science & Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the implementation of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China in 2009 use of Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment (QMRA) has increased. QMRA is used to assess the risk posed to consumers by pathogenic bacteria which cause the majority of foodborne outbreaks in China. This review analyses the progress of QMRA research in China from 2000 to 2013 and discusses 3 possible improvements for the future. These improvements include planning and scoping to initiate QMRA, effectiveness of microbial risk assessment utility for risk management decision making, and application of QMRA to establish appropriate Food Safety Objectives.

show abstract

Performance standards and meat safety — Developments and direction

Cited by 21 publications

References 21 publications

Storage life at 2 °C or −1.5 °C of vacuum‐packaged boneless and bone‐in cuts from decontaminated beef carcasses

Storage life at 2 °C or −1.5 °C of vacuum‐packaged boneless and bone‐in cuts from decontaminated beef carcasses

The seafood supply chain from a fraudulent perspective

Status and future of Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment in China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About