2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance revaluation of a N-type coaxial HPGe detector with front edges crystal using MCNPX

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discrepancies in the low energy region have also been reported for both Marinelli geometries and point sources in the literature (Ródenas et al, 2003;Huy, 2011;Britton et al, 2013). The photon energy of 59.54 keV is insufficient to reach the crystal just through the detector's outer top dead layer, but the photon energy of 662 keV is sufficient to reach both the outer lateral and inner dead layers of the crystal (Azli & Chaoui, 2015). At energies above 122.06 keV, the results of both GESPECOR (Table 3) and PHITS MC (Table 4) codes are in good agreement with experimental efficiencies with a maximum deviation of 2 % and 2.8 % respectively, at 1.5 mm dead layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discrepancies in the low energy region have also been reported for both Marinelli geometries and point sources in the literature (Ródenas et al, 2003;Huy, 2011;Britton et al, 2013). The photon energy of 59.54 keV is insufficient to reach the crystal just through the detector's outer top dead layer, but the photon energy of 662 keV is sufficient to reach both the outer lateral and inner dead layers of the crystal (Azli & Chaoui, 2015). At energies above 122.06 keV, the results of both GESPECOR (Table 3) and PHITS MC (Table 4) codes are in good agreement with experimental efficiencies with a maximum deviation of 2 % and 2.8 % respectively, at 1.5 mm dead layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The FEPE curve is affected the sample geometry, the sample matrix, and the density of the matrix as well as the detection system (Harb et al, 2008). The FEPE curve can be obtained either by using a known radioactive standard source homogeneously distributed in a Marinelli beaker of the same size and composition (Vasconcelos et al, 2011), or by accurately modeling the source geometry, matrix, the position of the source, and the detection system using MC-based simulations (Azli & Chaoui, 2015;Lépy et al, 2019). Using the Monte Carlo method, the detection process can be simulated and applied to obtain efficiency values for each geometry (Ródenas et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because detector simulation is mainly based on information provided by the manufacturer [4]. If the manufacturer gives the detector parameters missing, the accuracy of the simulations is directly affected [5][6][7]. The accuracy of the simulation results depends on adequate input data and the accuracy of the various approaches applied in the physical model [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ordonez et al in order to obtain a statistical error of less than 1.5%, they set the number of histories in each simulation at 20 million (Ordóñez et al, 2019). Azli & Chaoui (2015) used 100 million particles to achieve a relative error of less than 1% in the calculated efficiency. Subercaze et al (2022) used 3 million and Miroslav et al used 1 million particles in their study (Ješkovský et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%