2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance properties of rubberized stone matrix asphalt mixtures produced through different processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…o P#16R#30: CR particles passing #16 sieve and retained on #30 sieve with size between 0.6 -1. 18 mm for representing medium-sized fine aggregates. o P#30: CR particles passing #30 sieve with size smaller than 0.6 mm for representing small-sized fine aggregates.…”
Section: Crumb Rubber Particles Size and Content Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…o P#16R#30: CR particles passing #16 sieve and retained on #30 sieve with size between 0.6 -1. 18 mm for representing medium-sized fine aggregates. o P#30: CR particles passing #30 sieve with size smaller than 0.6 mm for representing small-sized fine aggregates.…”
Section: Crumb Rubber Particles Size and Content Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several overseas studies have found the wearing course structure built with dry process CRM-HMA to have inferior performance efficiency and fewer field applications than wet process CRM-HMA [11,18]. However, the dry process is more convenient to produce industrially as its production process is not much different from the conventional production process, with less extra work required during the paving process [6,7,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no apparent difference in the softening point of rubberized asphalt in various rubber powder contents. This cannot effectively distinguish the difference in the high-temperature performance and viscoelastic properties of rubberized asphalt [ 20 ].…”
Section: Test Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rubberized asphalt produced on-site is time limited; after a certain point, its performance will be significantly reduced—e.g., in a low construction environment [ 8 , 13 ]. Most of the manufacturing process of asphalt rubber is on-site production, and a sufficient working surface must be added at the construction site to complete the production of asphalt rubber [ 19 , 20 ]. If the project volume is not large, there is the risk of producing a large amount of waste, which is also an obstacle to the promotion of rubberized asphalt—underdeveloped construction and workability [ 3 , 7 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ali et al assessed antirutting properties of WMA (Warm Mix Asphalt) by using APA, pointing out that reducing the production temperature of foamed WMA might result in the increasing potential of permanent deformation and moisture-induced damage [10]. Xie and Shen researched the rutting resistance, moisture susceptibility, and fatigue resistance of rubberized SMA (Stone Matrix Asphalt), analyzing the incorporation of CRM (Crumb Rubber Modifier) by using APA [11]. Malladi et al researched moisture and rutting susceptibility of WMA by using APA and indicated that WMA performance is on a par with that of HMA and good potential for the widespread use of WMA [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%