Performance of Two Promising Sugar Cane Varieties Under Different Harvesting Dates

Osman, Mona A.; Al-Labbody, A.H.S.A.; Osman, A.

doi:10.21608/jpp.2011.85503

Cited by 4 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Such effect might be attributed to demonstrate that there was a substantial amount of growth in terms of cane stalk height at the end of harvesting ages for the promising varieties. These results are in accordance with those obtained by Ahmed (2003); Osman et al (2011);El-Geddawy et al (2012) and Hagos et al (2014) they reported that Stalk height was significantly affected by harvesting age.…”

Section: Stalk Heightsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…These results are in accordance with those obtained by Kumara and Bandara (2002); Ahmed (2003); Amolo, et. al., (2006) and Osman et. al., (2011) they harvest dates significantly differed in sugar recovery percentage.…”

Section: Sugar Recovery Percentagementioning

confidence: 97%

“…The results of the present study are in accordance with those of Jadhav, et. al., (2000); Ongin and Olweny (2011); Osman et. al.…”

Section: Brix Percentagementioning

confidence: 99%

“…al., 2006;Abd El-Razek et. al., 2011 ;Osman et. al., 2011;Ongin and Olweny 2011;El-Geddawy et al 2012 ;Mequanent and Ayele;Ahmed et.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Effect of Harvesting Age on Yield, Yield Components and Quality of Some Promising Sugarcane Varieties.

Ahmed¹,

Awadalla²

2016

Journal of Plant Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two field trails were carried out at El-Mattana Agricultural Research Station (latitude of 25.17 o N and longitude of 32.33 o E), Luxor Governorate, Upper Egypt during 2013/2014 (virgin cane) and 2014/2015 (first ratoon crop,) to find out the optimum harvesting age for some sugarcane varieties. Treatments consisted of a factorial combination of three promising sugarcane varieties (G.98-28, G. 99-160 and G.2003-49) and five harvesting age (10, 11, 12, 13 and 14-months) were arranged in factorial experiment conducted in randomized Complete Block Design with three replications. The results showed that all of the studied traits were significantly influenced by delaying the harvest age from 10 to 14-month age. Also, the results showed that the three promising sugarcane varieties significantly differed in stalk cane length, diameter, as well as Brix, sucrose purity, sugar recovery percentages, cane and sugar yields (Ton/fed.). Generally, promising sugarcane variety G.2003-49 was superior over the other two varieties i.e. G.98-28 and G. 99-160 in cane and sugar yields (Ton/fed.).

show abstract

Section: Stalk Heightsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Sugar Recovery Percentagementioning

confidence: 97%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effect of Harvesting Age on Yield, Yield Components and Quality of Some Promising Sugarcane Varieties.

Ahmed¹,

Awadalla²

2016

Journal of Plant Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This indicates that these genotypes had accumulated favorable alleles for tallness and could be used in future breeding programs. Ahmed (2003), Osman et al (2011), Hagos et al (2014 and Ahmed et al (2016 a) reported that delay harvesting date up to 14 months gave the highest values of stalk height in plant-cane and 1stratoon-crops.…”

Section: A1-stalk Lengthmentioning

confidence: 97%

Performance and stability analysis of some sugarcane genotypes across different environments

Ali

Hassan

Mohamed

et al. 2020

SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eleven genotypes of sugarcane (ten genotypes and one commercial variety G.T.54-9 as a control) were evaluated at twelve environments; three locations (Agric. Res. Stations of Kom-Ombo, Aswan governorate, El-Mataana, Luxor governorate and Shandaweel, Sohag governorate and two harvesting dates; 11 and 12 month-old in 2015/2016 (plant-cane) and 2016/2017 (first-ratoon).The differences among genotypes, locations and between harvesting dates were significant for all studied traits; stalk length, stalk weight, cane yield, brix, sucrose and sugar yield. The interaction of locations × genotypes was highly significant in plant-cane and first-ratoon for all studied traits. Locations × harvesting dates interaction was significantly for stalk length in plant-cane crop and for stalk weight, sucrose and sugar yield in first-ratoon crop. Mean squares due to interaction between genotypes, harvesting dates and locations were significantly for all studied traits, except cane and sugar yields in plant-crop and stalk length in first-ratoon. Mean cane yield ranged from 54.23 and 52.61 to 57.61 and 56.71t/fed at harvesting dates and from 46.66 and 50.12 to 60.71 and 58.69 t/fed under locations in plant-cane and first-ratoon, respectively. Late harvesting date increased cane yield and its components. The stability analysis of variance for cane yield showed that the intermediate yielding genotypes (G.2003-47, G.2004-27 and G.2011-82) were more stable than the rather responsive high yielding ones. However, the genotype G. 2004-27 was stable for cane yield and its components. In addition, it was considered to be superior for cane yield under different environments. However, the highest yielding genotype (G.99-103) was unstable.

show abstract

Yield and Quality of Some Sugar Cane Varieties as Affected by Har-vesting Age and Phosphorus Fertilization Levels

Toeima

Hamed

Abdel-Motagally

et al. 2020

AJAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study was conducted at district Kom Ombo sugar cane farms, (latitude of 24 o 28 o N and longitude of 32 o 57 o E), Aswan Governorate, in the two seasons of 2015/2016 and 2016/2017 including plant cane and 1 st ratoon crops, respectively. To study the effect of harvesting age and phosphorus fertilization levels on yield and quality of some sugar cane varieties. Field experiment included twenty-seven treatments represented the combinations among three harvesting ages (10, 11 and 12 months) three phosphorus fertilization levels [30, 45 and 60 kg P 2 O 5 /fad.] and three sugar cane varieties [G.T. 54-9, G.2003-47 and G.2004-27]. Randomized complete block design with three replications laind aut in split-split plots arrangement.The results showed that all of the studied traits were significantly influenced by the harvesting ages. The three sugar cane varieties significantly differed in all studied traits. The new commercial sugar cane variety G.2003-47 showed superiority over the other varieties in brix sucrose purity cane and sugar recovery percentages. Increasing phosphorus level from 30 up to 60 kg P 2 O 5 /fad. increased significantly brix, sucrose, purity and sugar recovery percentages, while cane and sugar yield tons/fad., in plant cane crop, only.Our data suggest that farmers should attempt to harvest the majority of their crop at age of 12 months. With fertilization by 60 kg P 2 O 5 /fad. to maximize yield.

show abstract

Performance of Two Promising Sugar Cane Varieties Under Different Harvesting Dates

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Effect of Harvesting Age on Yield, Yield Components and Quality of Some Promising Sugarcane Varieties.

Effect of Harvesting Age on Yield, Yield Components and Quality of Some Promising Sugarcane Varieties.

Performance and stability analysis of some sugarcane genotypes across different environments

Yield and Quality of Some Sugar Cane Varieties as Affected by Har-vesting Age and Phosphorus Fertilization Levels

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About