dThe QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-G IT) test (Cellestis Inc., Valencia, CA) is one of the gamma interferon release assays (IGRAs) that are promising tools for diagnosing active or latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections. We investigated the clinical and laboratory factors that affect the rate of indeterminate QFT-G IT test results. We also suggest a workflow strategy for achieving optimized test results using the QFT-G IT test for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB) or latent TB infection. We performed statistical analysis using data from a retrospective review of medical records. T uberculosis (TB) is one of the most common infectious diseases causing morbidity and death worldwide (1, 2). Moreover, population aging and increased use of immunosuppressive treatments highlight the need for additional strategies to maintain appropriate TB control (2, 3). Particularly in countries with low or intermediate prevalence rates, the diagnosis and treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI) are essential for the control of TB. The tuberculin skin test (TST) has been the standard diagnostic tool for screening for LTBI because it is inexpensive and easy to perform; however, it has a major limitation in diagnosing LTBI in BCG-vaccinated populations, including the Korean population, due to cross-reactivity between BCG and purified protein derivative (PPD) antigens (4, 5).Recently introduced gamma interferon (IFN-␥) release assays (IGRAs), including QuantiFERON TB-Gold (QFT-G) (Cellestis Ltd., Carnegie, Victoria, Australia) and TSPOT.TB (Oxford Immunotec, Oxford, United Kingdom), have an advantage over the TST with respect to the aforementioned limitation and have shown promise as alternative diagnostic tools for LTBI in BCGvaccinated populations (5, 6). IGRAs detect and quantify IFN-␥ secreted from T cells in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosisspecific antigens. However, immunological impairment may affect the performance of lymphocyte-based assays. Indeterminate results (i.e., results that are interpreted as unreliable, mainly due to inappropriate values for the negative and/or positive controls, regardless of the patient's results) are a limitation of these new methods, particularly in immunocompromised individuals (7). Rates of indeterminate results of 5% to 40% for all participants and approximately 6% for health care workers have been reported (8-10). Rates of indeterminate results of 15.6% and 16.1% have been reported for two large tertiary care hospitals in South Korea (11,12). Considering the composition of the high-risk populations and the therapeutic approaches used at the hospital, the frequency of indeterminate results may vary depending on hospital conditions.