1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(19971015)11:12<1595::aid-hyp489>3.0.co;2-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the steady-state dipole flow test in layered aquifers

Abstract: Steady-state numerical simulations of the dipole¯ow test in layered aquifers demonstrate that the test produces a good estimate of the equivalent hydraulic conductivity anisotropy ratio for the part of the aquifer spanned by the well chambers. The eects of chamber size, dierent conductivity of layers and layer location on the estimated anisotropy ratios are presented. The steady-state dipole¯ow test, when performed at dierent levels in the well, can yield estimates of the down-hole anisotropy ratio distributio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cylindrical coordinate system as shown in Figure 1 is employed. The governing equation as well as the initial and boundary conditions can be described as (Sutton et al, 2000;Xiang & Kabala, 1997)…”
Section: Groundwater Flow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cylindrical coordinate system as shown in Figure 1 is employed. The governing equation as well as the initial and boundary conditions can be described as (Sutton et al, 2000;Xiang & Kabala, 1997)…”
Section: Groundwater Flow Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept “dipole flow test” was first formally proposed to be a field‐tested technology by Kabala (1993) for the determination of vertical permeability. Since then, extensive studies of dipole flow were carried out through mathematical modeling, physical experiments and field site tests (Bodin et al, 2012; Hvilshøj et al, 2000; Johnson & Simon, 2007; Schaad, 1998; Simon et al, 2000; Sutton et al, 2000; Xiang & Kabala, 1997; Zlotnik et al, 2007; Zlotnik & Ledder, 1996; Zlotnik & Zurbuchen, 1998). For example, Xiang and Kabala (1997) analyzed the effects of hydraulic conductivity and location of layers as well as chamber size on the estimated hydraulic conductivity anisotropy ratio of layered aquifer; Sutton et al (2000) employed a streamtube modeling approach to interpret tracer test with dipole flow; Johnson and Simon (2007) employed in situ data of hydrogeological features and contaminant distribution in addition to chemical tracer test to form a robust protocol for characterizing flow pattern around VCW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, permeameter estimates may require an up-scaling to field conditions to be representative. In order to overcome this burdens, several authors have proposed different hydraulic tests in wells to estimate K-anisotropy, such as the dipole-flow test using in one well (Kabala, 1993;Zlotnik and Ledder, 1996;Xiang and Kabala, 1997;Zlotnik and Zurbuchen, 1998;Hvilshøj et al, 2000;Sutton et al, 2000;Zlotnik et al, 2001) or two wells (Goltz et al, 2008), the single-well vertical interference test (Burns Jr et al, 1969;Hirasaki et al, 1974;Onur et al, 2002;Sheng, 2009;Paradis and Lefebvre, 2013), and hydraulic tomography (Paradis et al, 2015a(Paradis et al, , 2016a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early attempts were conducted using Galerkin finite element, partial tracing and boundary element methods (Herrling and Stamm ; MacDonald and Kitanidis ). Subsequently, more complex cases, such as layered and/or fractured aquifers, multi circulation wells, were considered (Xiang and Kabala ; Halihan and Zlotnik ; Goltz et al ). However, most of the models either assume a confined aquifer or simplify the free‐surface as an impermeable boundary in an unconfined aquifer, because it is computationally more complicated to consider the free surface (MacDonald and Kitanidis ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%