2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the model for end-stage liver disease score for mortality prediction and the potential role of etiology

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar performance, both for discrimination and calibration, was recently reported for MELD and FIPS scores. [6,9] It should be acknowledged that our prediction model overestimates the 2-year risk of liver-related death in older adults. This could result in a more conservative selection of patients in the older adult population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar performance, both for discrimination and calibration, was recently reported for MELD and FIPS scores. [6,9] It should be acknowledged that our prediction model overestimates the 2-year risk of liver-related death in older adults. This could result in a more conservative selection of patients in the older adult population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, they were developed without considering OLT and extrahepatic death as events competing with liver‐related death and were not specifically derived and validated in older adults. Finally, the discriminative accuracy remains the main focus in the evaluation of performance, whereas calibration often receives less attention 9…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent multicenter study suggested that the Mayo TIPS score slightly overestimated the mortality risk when used in the TIPS setting and that the Mayo MELD and MELD UNOS scores substantially overestimated the mortality risk. 43 Interestingly, the same study also highlighted that the Mayo MELD and MELD UNOS are not broadly generalizable because of the lower discrimination and calibration observed in nonviral etiology compared to those in viral etiology. Third, malnutrition is a frequent complication of advanced cirrhosis and has been identified as an independent predictor of poor prognosis.…”
Section: The Meld Scorementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two independent investigators screened the medical records, including demographic, endoscopic reports, laboratory results, and clinical data. Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score [16], the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) [17], Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (CTP) [18] were calculated.…”
Section: Interventions and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%