Performance of the Emotiv Epoc headset for P300-based applications

Abstract

BackgroundFor two decades, EEG-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems have been widely studied in research labs. Now, researchers want to consider out-of-the-lab applications and make this technology available to everybody. However, medical-grade EEG recording devices are still much too expensive for end-users, especially disabled people. Therefore, several low-cost alternatives have appeared on the market. The Emotiv Epoc headset is one of them. Although some previous work showed this device could suit the customer’s needs in terms of performance, no quantitative classification-based assessments compared to a medical system are available.MethodsThis paper aims at statistically comparing a medical-grade system, the ANT device, and the Emotiv Epoc headset by determining their respective performances in a P300 BCI using the same electrodes. On top of that, a review of previous Emotiv studies and a discussion on practical considerations regarding both systems are proposed. Nine healthy subjects participated in this experiment during which the ANT and the Emotiv systems are used in two different conditions: sitting on a chair and walking on a treadmill at constant speed.ResultsThe Emotiv headset performs significantly worse than the medical device; observed effect sizes vary from medium to large. The Emotiv headset has higher relative operational and maintenance costs than its medical-grade competitor.ConclusionsAlthough this low-cost headset is able to record EEG data in a satisfying manner, it should only be chosen for non critical applications such as games, communication systems, etc. For rehabilitation or prosthesis control, this lack of reliability may lead to serious consequences. For research purposes, the medical system should be chosen except if a lot of trials are available or when the Signal-to-Noise Ratio is high. This also suggests that the design of a specific low-cost EEG recording system for critical applications and research is still required.

The Emotiv EPOC interface paradigm in Human-Computer Interaction

“…The EPOC system has also been successfully used to measure the response of cortical response to auditory stimulation (evoked potential, P3 component) [2,3] and visual stimulation [3,4]. The results indicated a high accuracy for ERP (event-related potential or evoked potential) peaks, ie.…”

Virtual Reality and Brain Computer Interface in Neurorehabilitation

“…Th is device was originally developed for gaming, but has been increasingly used in research studies ( 15 -17 ). Although this off -the shelf BCI is less sensitive in its capture of electroencephalographic data when compared with traditional medical devices ( 18 ), its portability, ease of use, and cost made it an attractive option for an inpatient hospital setting. Th is device allows for wireless 14-channel electroencephalographic recording based on the international 10 to 20 locations (AF3, F7, F3, FC5, T7, P7, O1, O2, P8, T8, FC6, F4, F8, AF4) along with two reference electrodes (P3, P4).…”

Brain–computer interface targeting non-motor functions after spinal cord injury: a case report

“…The Emotive EEG gaming system (Emotiv EPOC; http:// emotiv.com) yields less sophisticated electroencephalography data than traditional medical devices, 4 but the minimal cost and portability made it a preferred system. The ability to manage a virtual environment was assessed with a cube rotation and manipulation paradigm presented on a laptop computer.…”