1991
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9002(91)90038-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of the ALEPH Time Projection Chamber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the data used in these analyses, taken in 1990 and 1991, charged tracks are measured over the range jcos( )j < 0:95, where is the polar angle, by an inner cylindrical drift chamber (itc) and a large cylindrical time projection chamber (tpc). These chambers are immersed in a magnetic eld of 1.5 Tesla and together measure the momentum of charged particles with a resolution [3] of P=P = 0 : 0008P (P in GeV=c)…”
Section: The Aleph Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the data used in these analyses, taken in 1990 and 1991, charged tracks are measured over the range jcos( )j < 0:95, where is the polar angle, by an inner cylindrical drift chamber (itc) and a large cylindrical time projection chamber (tpc). These chambers are immersed in a magnetic eld of 1.5 Tesla and together measure the momentum of charged particles with a resolution [3] of P=P = 0 : 0008P (P in GeV=c)…”
Section: The Aleph Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calorimeters and muon chambers cover nearly the entire 4 solid angle. 3 The simulation of heavy avour processes in Z decays at LEP…”
Section: The Aleph Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the nite two track resolution of the TPC, two same-sign tracks with momenta larger than 5 GeV=c and an opening angle less than two degrees often are not properly resolved [14]. In order to increase the rejection of such candidates, additional cuts were applied in the track selection and dE=dx evaluation.…”
Section: Event Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 the expected ionization loss (dE=dx) curves of known particles in the ALEPH TPC are shown, normalized to a minimum ionizing particle (MIP), as a function of the apparent momentum (momentum divided by the magnitude of the charge). These lines are drawn according to the empirical formula [13], dE dx = q 2 p (K + 2 ln () p ()) ; (1) where q is the charge in units of the electron charge, and are the usual Lorentz variables, and , p, K, and the polynomial () are obtained from the ALEPH data [14]. A scatter-plot of dE=dx versus apparent momentum from part of the data sample is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%