2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of success and failure in grassroots conservation and development interventions: Gender dynamics in participatory forest management in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the National Forest Policy of Pakistan 2015, the lawmakers have taken steps to manage forests and improve public awareness of the ecological and cultural values of forests [26][27][28][29]. Nevertheless, forests have been weakly preserved in recent years and it is a challenging task in northern areas of Pakistan to apply strict rules of preservation due to the high reliance of peoples on the natural resources of forests [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the National Forest Policy of Pakistan 2015, the lawmakers have taken steps to manage forests and improve public awareness of the ecological and cultural values of forests [26][27][28][29]. Nevertheless, forests have been weakly preserved in recent years and it is a challenging task in northern areas of Pakistan to apply strict rules of preservation due to the high reliance of peoples on the natural resources of forests [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our research has contextual and historical limitations as a regional, Namibian study with a focus on CBNRM. Its wider applicability, however, lies in the importance of critically analyzing articulations of failure and success in other parts of the world, such as East Africa (Kimanthi and Hebinck 2018;Svarstad and Benjaminsen 2017), as well as beyond the African continent (Nandigama 2019;To and Dressler 2019) and in different disciplines. As mentioned in the introduction, disciplinary reflexive responses are part of disciplines such as geography (Sidaway 2000) and political ecology (Neimark et al 2019;Ramutsindela et al 2016), both highly relevant for conservation and development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third author has carried out independent academic anthropology and ecology research in north-west Namibia since 1992, witnessing and researching key moments and tensions in the establishment of CBNRM in this context. Success, Failure and Namibian CBNRM Mosse (2004) shows that both success and failure can become policy-oriented framings that mask project effects "on the ground," and the structuring effects of "success" or "failure" have been observed in research on nature conservation (B€ uscher 2013;Catalano et al 2019;Sullivan 2002;To and Dressler 2019) and development (B€ uscher 2014;Clemens, Kenny, and Moss 2007;Kimanthi and Hebinck 2018;Nandigama 2019;Svarstad and Benjaminsen 2017). Blaikie (2006Blaikie ( , 1946, in his critical assessment of CBNRM, finds that "[t]here are success stories too, although they are stories told by the initiating agencies themselves" (see also B€ uscher 2013;Sullivan 2002).…”
Section: Social Constructivismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do recognise that the socio-ecological practices change over a period of time for any given community ( Nandigama, 2020 ). However, it becomes crucial to raise the alarm when these changes end up being unsustainable for the community's self-sufficiency, existence and continuity.…”
Section: Concluding Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%