2007 Second International Conference on Access Networks &Amp; Workshops 2007
DOI: 10.1109/accessnets.2007.4447112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of rapid spanning tree protocol in access and metro networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RTSP) [7], an augmented STP protocol, was designed to converge faster after link failures. However, STPs fail to offer path diversity and hence fail to maximize the utilization of available resources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol (RTSP) [7], an augmented STP protocol, was designed to converge faster after link failures. However, STPs fail to offer path diversity and hence fail to maximize the utilization of available resources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Root Port and the Designated Ports are in forwarding state while the Alternate Ports are in discarding state in a stable topology. The forwarding ports transmit and receive all frames while discarding ports transmit and receive only BPDUs [1,9] thus pruning the network to a simple tree topology.…”
Section: Inefficient Address Removal Of Rstpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of waiting for timeouts to start communicating, RSTP uses a proactive mechanism based on confirmation messages as the topology information is disseminated [25] [30] show that the 50ms bound is only achieved in topologies of only a few nodes. In addition, since RSTP is a distance-vector algorithm, it suffers the count-to-infinity problem when recovering from the Root failure [14].…”
Section: Ieee 8021 Spanning Tree Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They use the OPNET [62] simulations and validate the results with small test-beds. An interesting analysis is included in [30], which focuses on the characterization of the processing delays of real equipment in small test-beds. Depending on the device, delays between 1, 33ms and 12ms are observed.…”
Section: Failure Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation