2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2007.378624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Quantized Min-Sum Decoding Algorithms for Irregular LDPC Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the simple structure of the variable node gives less space for improvement. For this reason, few studies [5,6] have considered the improvement of variable nodes. In [5], the variable node which receives soft information from channels was multiplied, with a correction item to improve the performance [3,4] executed in the irregular matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the simple structure of the variable node gives less space for improvement. For this reason, few studies [5,6] have considered the improvement of variable nodes. In [5], the variable node which receives soft information from channels was multiplied, with a correction item to improve the performance [3,4] executed in the irregular matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, few studies [5,6] have considered the improvement of variable nodes. In [5], the variable node which receives soft information from channels was multiplied, with a correction item to improve the performance [3,4] executed in the irregular matrix. In [6], transform circuits were added to the length of quantization (Q-LLR) to reduce the bit number required in the algorithm, hence reducing the hardware area of the memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we can reduce one bit for each intrinsic (or extrinsic) message, the storage complexity can be significantly reduced. In [13] [14] [23], several quantization schemes were presented. In [13], the authors proposed using different quantization schemes at different signalto-noise ratios (SNRs) for intrinsic messages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], the authors proposed using different quantization schemes at different signalto-noise ratios (SNRs) for intrinsic messages. In [14][23], intrinsic messages are scaled down as the iteration number increases in order to compensate the quantization errors caused by finite precision. It is worth noting that both quantization schemes presented in [13] and [14] focused on the quantization of the intrinsic messages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this choice tends to produce a larger PE area with respect to minsum approaches, the decoding performances are improved, enabling less decoding iterations to be implemented. In particular, [29] showed how minsum performance tends to be degraded by fixed-point implementations and in presence of irregular codes. Starting from these considerations we expect our area occupation to be larger than the other ones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%