Governance of Public Sector Organizations 2010
DOI: 10.1057/9780230290600_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of Public Sector Organizations: Do Managerial Tools Matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, ministries also tend to measure what they need (focus in performance indicators), which is in contrast with Taylor (2011) who argued that there is lack of fit between what is measured and what is used. This trend of using measured performance by politicians is in line with the points raised by Van Dooren et al (2010); Kroll (2015) that measured performance is used in decision-making and is not merely a box-ticking exercise (Van Dooren and Hoffman, 2018).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, ministries also tend to measure what they need (focus in performance indicators), which is in contrast with Taylor (2011) who argued that there is lack of fit between what is measured and what is used. This trend of using measured performance by politicians is in line with the points raised by Van Dooren et al (2010); Kroll (2015) that measured performance is used in decision-making and is not merely a box-ticking exercise (Van Dooren and Hoffman, 2018).…”
Section: Discussion Of the Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Neo-institutional theories range from economic neo-institutionalism to sociological institutionalism and historical institutionalism, all of which propose explanations for the wider variety of public administration questions. Economic institutionalism focuses on a rational choice model, sociological institutionalism subscribes to the logic of appropriateness (Verhoest et al ., 2010) and historical institutionalism emphasizes on path dependency. In this article, we use economic institutionalism while being aware of its limitations.…”
Section: Reflections From Theory and Literature On Performance Management: Measuring And Using The Performance Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the three studies that Andrews cites, which link efficiency and agencification, such results are not clearly corroborated. In general, the studies needed should focus not only on efficiency, but also on any management instrument or measure of performance, such as performance management (output, input, productivity, and efficiency), human resources management, quality, and financial performance or management (Meyers et al, 2010;Queeneville et al, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Basis Of the Differences Between Weberian Bureaumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It replaces the implicit relationship between citizens and the state with explicit contracts and performance targets. Such a fundamental reshaping of the relationship between citizens and the state could be highly problematic, because even though citizens want better and improved services from the state, their desire is even stronger to be treated as citizens who have a voice, respect and special rights protected and defended by the state (Bovaird and Löffler 2009;Verhoest, Verschuere, Meyers, et al 2010). Moreover, and in order to be effective, a "contract needs to specify delivery (what, when, how and by whom − technical agreement) and payment (how much, when, by whom and with what guarantees − the commercial agreement)" (Hubbard et al 1999: 157) between the principal and the agent.…”
Section: Contractualism As a Reform And Governance Tool: A Theoretical Conceptualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%