Performance of Modular Prefabricated Architecture: Case Study-Based Review and Future Pathways

Abstract

Even though tightened building energy efficiency standards are implemented periodically in many countries, existing buildings continually consume a momentous quota of the total primary energy. Energy efficiency solutions range from material components to bulk systems. A technique of building construction, referred to as prefabricated architecture (prefab), is increasing in reputation. Prefab encompasses the offsite fabrication of building components to a greater degree of finish as bulk building structures and systems, and their assembly on-site. In this context, prefab improves the speed of construction, quality of architecture, efficiency of materials, and worker safety, while limiting environmental impacts of construction, as compared to conventional site-built construction practices. Quite recently, a 57 story skyscraper was built in 19 days using prefabricated modules. From the building physics point of view, the bulk systems and tighter integration method of prefab minimizes thermal bridges. This study seeks to clearly characterize the levels of prefab and to investigate the performance of modular prefab; considering acoustic constrain, seismic resistance, thermal behavior, energy consumption, and life cycle analysis of existing prefab cases and, thus, provides a dynamic case study-based review. Generally, prefab can be categorized into components, panels (2D), modules (3D), hybrids, and unitized whole buildings. On average, greenhouse gas emissions from conventional construction were higher than for modular construction, not discounting some individual discrepancies. Few studies have focused on monitored data on prefab and occupants' comfort but additional studies are required to understand the public's perception of the technology. The scope of the work examined will be of interest to building engineers, manufacturers, and energy experts, as well as serve as a foundational reference for future study.

Construction 4.0: Its impact towards delivering quality and sustainable houses in South Africa

“…For the construction 4.0 concepts that support the establishment of a smart construction site, table 2 showed that the respondents are very ready to adopt prefabrication/modularization and the use of radio frequency identification (RFID) for construction activities during the delivery of houses. Their readiness to use prefabrication and RFID can be related to the already established benefit of adopting prefabrication in other developed countries as shown by authors such as [45], [46]. Likewise, the use of RFID has been prescribed by authors such as Sardroud [43], Costin and Telzer [44] they discover that it allows the automation of construction process by allowing effective tracking of equipment and tools, theft prevention and inventory management.…”

The Index System for the Development Level Evaluation of Regional Construction Industrialization: a Case Study in Jiangsu, China

“…However, most of the previous studies on construction industrialization concentrated on the technical aspects of the system, energy analysis, energy efficiency and Building Information Modeling [5,6], with only a limited number of studies being conducted on the regional development level of construction industrialization. Wang and Ji analyzed various factors they believed were affecting development of construction industrialization in China, before building a system that incorporated these influencing factors.…”

Robotic prefabrication of timber structures: towards automated large-scale spatial assembly

“…An automated prefabrication of singular timber elements has been demonstrated on various research studies and projects in the last decades (Sass 2007;Beyer 1991;Scheurer 2011). The degree of prefabrication describes the size and complexity of prefabricated components, which is directly related to the amount of on-site construction labor, material use, construction quality, and, therefore, sustainability performance (Boafo et al 2016). Even today, CNC technologies are used predominantly for subtractive processes in the industry (Popovic et al 2016), which can also be noted in the available manufacturing techniques of current timber production lines (Hans Hundegger 2016).…”