2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of diagnostic tests to detect respiratory viruses in older adults

Abstract: The performance of 4 laboratory methods for diagnosis of viral respiratory tract infections (RTI) in older adults was evaluated. Seventy-four nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens were obtained from 60 patients with RTI at a long-term care facility over 2 respiratory seasons. Sixteen specimens were positive for a respiratory virus by at least 1 method. Multiplex reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) by the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel (RVP) detected 16 (100%) of the positive specimens, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…33,34 The performance of both traditional and molecular-based tests varies according to the age group studied. 35 However, generally the younger children tend to show a higher viral load than older individuals. In general, this observation may account for a more favorable performance between traditional and molecular-based testing in the younger age group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34 The performance of both traditional and molecular-based tests varies according to the age group studied. 35 However, generally the younger children tend to show a higher viral load than older individuals. In general, this observation may account for a more favorable performance between traditional and molecular-based testing in the younger age group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 This technique is particularly useful in the elderly, who often have a lower nasopharyngeal viral burden than children. 74,75 Moreover, some viruses (such as bocavirus) are hard to culture, and antigen testing may be equivocal (e.g. parainfluenza or adenovirus), so they can only be satisfactorily identified using PCR.…”
Section: Microbiological Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En relación con el procesamiento de la muestra, los sistemas basados en PCR son 2-5 veces más sensibles que los métodos convencionales para la detección de virus respiratorios 30 . Esta técnica es especialmente útil en los ancianos, quienes suelen portar en la nasofaringe menor carga viral que los niños 74,75 . Además, algunos virus son difícilmente cultivables (como el bocavirus), o equívocamente detectables a través de antígeno (como el virus parainfluenza o el adenovirus), por lo que solo pueden ser adecuadamente identificados por PCR [76][77][78] .…”
Section: Diagnóstico Microbiológicounclassified