2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(02)00329-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of an ultra-low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane (ULPROM) for separating heavy metal: effects of interference parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
113
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of its high toxicity, it is imperative to significantly reduce its discharge levels (Bianchi and Levis 1984). Many methods have been used for removal of heavy metals in wastewaters such as reverse osmosis (Ozaki et al 2002), ion exchange , membrane separation (Kozlowski and Walkowiak 2002;Shaalan et al 2001), chemical precipitation, and electrolysis (Tunali Akar et al 2009). Among these, the adsorption method is superior because of its higher efficiency and simple operation (Bailey et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its high toxicity, it is imperative to significantly reduce its discharge levels (Bianchi and Levis 1984). Many methods have been used for removal of heavy metals in wastewaters such as reverse osmosis (Ozaki et al 2002), ion exchange , membrane separation (Kozlowski and Walkowiak 2002;Shaalan et al 2001), chemical precipitation, and electrolysis (Tunali Akar et al 2009). Among these, the adsorption method is superior because of its higher efficiency and simple operation (Bailey et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of an aromatic polyamide (ES20) ultra-low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane for separating divalent (Cu 2+ ), (Ni 2+ ) and hexavalent (Cr 6+ ) heavy metals from bulk solution was investigated. The rejection of heavy metals was found to be greater than 95% for tested membranes [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to eliminate Cr (VI) from the environment in order to prevent the deleterious impact on ecosystem and public health. There are various treatment technologies available to remove the Cr (VI) from wastewater such as chemical precipitation [3], ion-exchange [4][5][6][7][8][9], membrane process as reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration and nanofiltration [10][11][12][13][14], flotation [15], electrocoagulation [16], solvent extraction [17], sedimentation [18], reduction [19], dialysis/electrodialysis [20], adsorption [21][22][23][24] and biosorption [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%