2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-012-0045-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solutions by using low-cost biological wastes: equilibrium and kinetic studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Kamsonlian et al evaluated the effectiveness of some biomass prepared from mango leaf powder and rice husk to remove As(III) from aqueous solutions (Kamsonlian et al 2012). The batch removal of hexavelant chromium from aqueous solutions using almond shell, activated sawdust and activated carbon under different experimental conditions was investigated (Aliabadi et al 2012). The adsorption behavior of some low-cost adsorbents such as peanut husk charcoal, fly ash and natural zeolite, with respect to Cu(II) and Zn(II) ions, has been also investigated in order to address the purification of metal finishing wastewater (Abdel Salam et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Kamsonlian et al evaluated the effectiveness of some biomass prepared from mango leaf powder and rice husk to remove As(III) from aqueous solutions (Kamsonlian et al 2012). The batch removal of hexavelant chromium from aqueous solutions using almond shell, activated sawdust and activated carbon under different experimental conditions was investigated (Aliabadi et al 2012). The adsorption behavior of some low-cost adsorbents such as peanut husk charcoal, fly ash and natural zeolite, with respect to Cu(II) and Zn(II) ions, has been also investigated in order to address the purification of metal finishing wastewater (Abdel Salam et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques have certain disadvantages such as incomplete removal, complicated treatment process, high cost, high energy requirement and operational cost, use of chemicals, and generation of toxic sludge or other waste products that again require disposal (Dubey and Shiwani 2012;Aliabadi et al 2012;Kumar et al 2012). Adsorption processes using natural adsorbents or agricultural waste products are becoming the new alternatives for the removal of fluoride from aqueous solution as they are cheap, simple, sludge-free, regenerable, environment friendly, involve small initial cost, and minimal chemical use (Saka et al 2012;Zhu et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equation for the pseudo-first-order kinetic model can be expressed as below (Aliabadi et al 2012):…”
Section: Pseudo-first-order Kinetics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pseudo-second-order kinetic model (Ho and McKay 1999;Aliabadi et al 2012) is described by the following equation:…”
Section: Pseudo-second-order Kinetics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%