2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor for the aerobic treatment of abattoir wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result indicated a limited rate of microorganism growth and biomass decay in a relatively autotrophic run [26]. Under such an oligotrophic environment, organic carbon was likely to be taken up by the starved community to derive energy for system sustainability rather than assimilated for microbial growth, and the significantly decreased K d is likely due to the lower aeration intensity [27], [28]. In summary, we preliminarily concluded that the sludge reduction in R 0 was a result of both source reduction (influent organic carbon) and process reduction (bio-metabolism pathways).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This result indicated a limited rate of microorganism growth and biomass decay in a relatively autotrophic run [26]. Under such an oligotrophic environment, organic carbon was likely to be taken up by the starved community to derive energy for system sustainability rather than assimilated for microbial growth, and the significantly decreased K d is likely due to the lower aeration intensity [27], [28]. In summary, we preliminarily concluded that the sludge reduction in R 0 was a result of both source reduction (influent organic carbon) and process reduction (bio-metabolism pathways).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Conversely, the operating costs of aerobic systems are higher than those for anaerobic systems due to the maintenance and energy requirements for artificial oxygenation. There are different aerobic unit operations for SWW treatment, such as aerobic AS, rotating biological contactors (RBCs), and sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) [39].…”
Section: Aerobic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental set-up and operating conditions were described in Keskes et al [22]. The ultrafiltration membranes were bundle of polysulfone hollow fibers; nominal pore size of membranes was (0.03-0.4 mm).…”
Section: Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%