2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2018.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a highly successful outbreak strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a multifaceted approach to bacterial fitness assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Haarlem was the predominant lineage and LAM represented the smallest group of genotypes. In fact, Haarlem has been identified as responsible for outbreaks, with determinate isolates eliciting a differential immune response that explains some advantage in causing TB [38]. However, in the present study, no lineage was more prone to form clusters, since the clusters were distributed in different lineages.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Haarlem was the predominant lineage and LAM represented the smallest group of genotypes. In fact, Haarlem has been identified as responsible for outbreaks, with determinate isolates eliciting a differential immune response that explains some advantage in causing TB [38]. However, in the present study, no lineage was more prone to form clusters, since the clusters were distributed in different lineages.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Again, very little is known about the significance of these effects and the balance of outcomes in the field, that is, on livestock‐associated premises. Assessments of fitness that involve bioassays (Yokobori et al., ) or simulations of field environments may be helpful in this area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. We extracted and normalized bacteria counts measured from an in vitro axenic culture of M. tuberculosis H37Rv from Yokobori et al (2018) corresponding to hour 300 for T(t) and hour 200 for t 0 , and counts for T(t) were subtracted with a sufficiently small ε to account for the small distance between T(t) and K at t. By substituting the resulting K 100, T(t) 100 − ε, t 0 32.6, and t 4.17, we obtain α 2 0.3423 1 d . For Tf, we assumed that α 3 α 2 .…”
Section: Bacterial Growth αmentioning
confidence: 99%