2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.02.263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance of a C60+ ion source on a dynamic SIMS instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values compare surprisingly well with those determined during inorganic depth profiling of delta dopant layers in semiconductors . For the specific case of 20‐keV C 60 cluster projectiles (as used in the simulations determining the input parameters used here), a depth resolution of approximately 5 nm was observed when profiling across a standard Ni‐Cr multilayer structure . For the case of molecular depth profiling, delta layer systems suitable to assess the depth resolution have recently been developed .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…These values compare surprisingly well with those determined during inorganic depth profiling of delta dopant layers in semiconductors . For the specific case of 20‐keV C 60 cluster projectiles (as used in the simulations determining the input parameters used here), a depth resolution of approximately 5 nm was observed when profiling across a standard Ni‐Cr multilayer structure . For the case of molecular depth profiling, delta layer systems suitable to assess the depth resolution have recently been developed .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Despite the obvious successes of C þ 60 bombardment of polymeric materials, deposition of carbon and large topography features can be associated with C þ 60 beams at lower energies (Fahey et al, 2006;Gillen et al, 2006a;Green et al, 2009). This is a particular problem with Si substrates, which is often used as a support for polymer thin films.…”
Section: Standard Methods Astm E1428-91 Uses the Following Equation; Dmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, a cluster ion beam should, in principle, yield better depth resolution compared to an isoenergetic atomic ion beam, with the advantage increasing with increasing projectile nuclearity. A hint in that direction was indeed found for a number of metallic and semiconductor samples under bombardment with cluster ions like SF 5 + , C n − , CsC n − and C 60 + clusters 1, 8–10. In general, it was found that cluster ion beams offer improved depth resolution and a reduction in sputter‐induced topography formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%