2011
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance, metabolic, and endocrine responses of periparturient Holstein cows fed 3 sources of fat

Abstract: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of feeding diets containing fat supplements enriched in either saturated fatty acids (n = 10), Ca salts of trans-octadecenoic fatty acids (tFA, n = 10) or Ca salts of safflower oil fatty acids (SFL, high in linoleic acid, n = 9) on performance, metabolic, and endocrine responses of periparturient Holstein cows. Dietary treatments were initiated at approximately 28 d before calculated calving dates and continued through 49 d postpartum. Blood samples for met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Zachut et al (2010) reported higher EB when cows were fed WF than CON (2.3 and 0.8 Mcal/day, respectively); however, when evaluating EB nadir (the lowest value of EB), the authors observed −7.7 and −3.6 Mcal/day for WF and CON diet, respectively. Caldari-Torres et al (2011) also observed greater EB during postpartum for animals fed a diet rich in C18:3 FA when compared with the other diets, with the values obtained during the 7 th week of lactation (2.10, −0.10 and 4.70 Mcal/day for diets rich in saturated, C18:2 and C18:3 FA, respectively). Nonetheless, despite all cows presented EB nadir during the 1 st week of lactation, in the current study, cows supplemented with FA presented higher EB than those cows fed CON, reaching positive EB in the 9 th , 6 th , 5 th and 6 th week of lactation for CON, WF, WS and CSFA diets, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Zachut et al (2010) reported higher EB when cows were fed WF than CON (2.3 and 0.8 Mcal/day, respectively); however, when evaluating EB nadir (the lowest value of EB), the authors observed −7.7 and −3.6 Mcal/day for WF and CON diet, respectively. Caldari-Torres et al (2011) also observed greater EB during postpartum for animals fed a diet rich in C18:3 FA when compared with the other diets, with the values obtained during the 7 th week of lactation (2.10, −0.10 and 4.70 Mcal/day for diets rich in saturated, C18:2 and C18:3 FA, respectively). Nonetheless, despite all cows presented EB nadir during the 1 st week of lactation, in the current study, cows supplemented with FA presented higher EB than those cows fed CON, reaching positive EB in the 9 th , 6 th , 5 th and 6 th week of lactation for CON, WF, WS and CSFA diets, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were dissolved in n-hexanes and quantified using a GC-2010 Plus gas chromatograph (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) using a CP-Sil 88 WCOT fused silica column (100 m 3 0.25 mm i.d. 3 0.2 mm film thickness; Varian Inc., Lake Forest, CA, USA) according to our previous published methods (Caldari-Torres et al, 2011). The FAME were identified by comparison of retention times with known FAME standards (Caldari-Torres et al, 2011).…”
Section: Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 0.2 mm film thickness; Varian Inc., Lake Forest, CA, USA) according to our previous published methods (Caldari-Torres et al, 2011). The FAME were identified by comparison of retention times with known FAME standards (Caldari-Torres et al, 2011).…”
Section: Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies conducted on the effect of fat supplementation on reproductive hormones in dairy cows have been conflicting and inconsistent [11]. For instance, some studies reported increased P4 concentrations in cows [12,13], while others either found no change [8] or a decrease in P4 concentrations [14]. Some studies have also shown that LH and FSH were influenced by fat supplementation, while in others, they were unaltered or decreased [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%