1997
DOI: 10.3109/14992029709048014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance in Quiet and in Noise with the Nucleus® Spectra 22 and the Clarion CIS/CA Cochlear Implant Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of competitive noise in the test room caused significant reduction of performance to all assessed hearing situations, even in situations considered to be more favorable, with S/N +15 dB, in which speech signal level was 15 dB above the noise level, as detected in previous studies 16,17 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The introduction of competitive noise in the test room caused significant reduction of performance to all assessed hearing situations, even in situations considered to be more favorable, with S/N +15 dB, in which speech signal level was 15 dB above the noise level, as detected in previous studies 16,17 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The longer the deafness, the lower the rates of CPA sentence recognition in ratios S/N +5 dB, +10 dB and +15 dB, evidencing that deafness time is one of the most important indicators of post-surgical performance 17,20 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Better speech perception scores with the Clarion device were also found compared to the Ineraid device [8]. In contrast, Battmer et al [9] showed no difference between the Nucleus 22 and the Clarion device in either quiet or noise. Similarly, no difference in speech perception performance was found between the Med-El and the Nucleus 24 implant devices [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Da diese Ergebnisse z. T. mit dem Nucleus Sprachprozessor der 1. Generation erzielt wurden, verglichen wir unsere Ergebnisse auch mit aktuellen Studien aus Hannover mit dem "Clarion-Implantat" [3] und Nucleus/SPrint ® -Prozessor der Freiburger HNO-Klinik [1]. Nach 3 Monaten erreichten unsere Patienten im "speech tracking" ohne Lippenabsehen 18,2 Wör-ter/min (WpM) (Hannover 15,6 WpM, Freiburg 18,7 WpM).…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified