1996
DOI: 10.1117/12.243450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance improvement of HgCdTe photoconductive detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A D * of only 5 × 10 7 (at 10 µm) at room temperature (Galus et al 1979) has been reported. Also, for cooled operation at 77 K smaller values than theoretically expected have been achieved: D * = 1.5 × 10 10 (at 8-10.5 µm) (Potet 1996) and D * = 1.0 × 10 11 (at 5-8 µm) (Sano et al 1996). Obviously, quantum detectors are greatly handicapped in the far-IR by the fact that their intrinsic noise power increases exponentially with temperature (thermal excitation across the semiconductor gap), whereas the dielectric noise of pyroelectrics, or the Johnson noise of thermistors, increases only as the square root of temperature.…”
Section: The Limits Of Pyroelectric Detection Comparison With Photon ...mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A D * of only 5 × 10 7 (at 10 µm) at room temperature (Galus et al 1979) has been reported. Also, for cooled operation at 77 K smaller values than theoretically expected have been achieved: D * = 1.5 × 10 10 (at 8-10.5 µm) (Potet 1996) and D * = 1.0 × 10 11 (at 5-8 µm) (Sano et al 1996). Obviously, quantum detectors are greatly handicapped in the far-IR by the fact that their intrinsic noise power increases exponentially with temperature (thermal excitation across the semiconductor gap), whereas the dielectric noise of pyroelectrics, or the Johnson noise of thermistors, increases only as the square root of temperature.…”
Section: The Limits Of Pyroelectric Detection Comparison With Photon ...mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Pixels with sensitive area size W×∆L = 50×50 µ m were either standard quadrant with length of semiconductor slab along bias current path equals to L = ∆ L = 50 µ m or with "shadowing" shield ( Fig. 4B) eliminating "sweep-out" effect of minority charge carriers 16,17 and with length of semiconductor slab along bias current path equals to L = 140 µ m. Devices were tested for spectral response, I-V curve, responsivity R V and low-frequency noise spectral density (NSD) at different background flux density (T bgr ≈ 300 K) at T op ≈ 290 -300 K and 78 K. Excess charge carriers were excited in sensitive structure by illumination through front graded-gap adjacent layer (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Metering Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%