2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of Wavewatch III in the Mediterranean Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
111
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
11
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more complete analysis could be achieved through use of either data collected by another waverider (e.g., that of Cesenatico, FC, which is ∼ 80 km north of Senigallia) or model hindcasts (e.g., Mentaschi et al, 2015), with the aim to characterize the wave forcing during further time periods, after a proper data validation. Although global reanalysis or numerical modeling may provide a more detailed wave characterization, use of available regional climate models (e.g., The Medatlas Group, 2004) is easier and may represent a valid alternative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more complete analysis could be achieved through use of either data collected by another waverider (e.g., that of Cesenatico, FC, which is ∼ 80 km north of Senigallia) or model hindcasts (e.g., Mentaschi et al, 2015), with the aim to characterize the wave forcing during further time periods, after a proper data validation. Although global reanalysis or numerical modeling may provide a more detailed wave characterization, use of available regional climate models (e.g., The Medatlas Group, 2004) is easier and may represent a valid alternative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wave model the source terms of growth/dissipation ST4 [Ardhuin et al, 2010;Rascle and Ardhuin, 2013;Mentaschi et al, 2015] was employed. The model setup consists of a global regular mesh with a resolution of 1.5°, spanning from latitude 80°S to 80°N, with nests on specific areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, substantial differences can be found when performing an EVA that considers directly observed and model wave data [10][11][12][13][14]. This difference is primarily due to the obvious fact that direct data, even though affected by errors-like any experiment-are still a more reliable estimate of the true values, compared to a model chain that, despite all the efforts and the care taken, is the result of enormously complicated calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%