Performance evaluation of routing protocols RIPng, OSPFv3, and EIGRP in an IPv6 network

Masruroh, Siti; Robby, Fadly; Hakiem, Nashrul

doi:10.1109/iac.2016.7905699

Cited by 18 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…"Performance Analysis and Redistribution Among RIPv2, EIGRP, and OSPF Routing Protocol" keterkaitan dengan penelitian sebelumnya sama-sama membahas tentang redistribusi routing, yang menjadi perbedaan dengan penelitian sebelumnya yaitu interface yang digunakan masih menggunakan interface serial untuk menghubungi antar router, topologi, dan metrik yang gunakan misalnya jumlah bandwitdh pada setiap jalurnya [8]. "Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocols RIPng, OPSFv3, and EGIRP in an Ipv6 Network" Keterkaitan dengan penelitian sebelumnya masih sama membahas tentang redistribusi routing, hanya saja perbedaan yang menonjol dimana pada penelitian sebelumnya dilakukan pada p rotokol routing untuk protokol jaringan IPv6, dengan menambahkan variabel pengukuran QoS yaitu jilter, pada protokol pengujian untuk menghubungan antar router semuanya menggunakan interface serial, dan IOS Cisco 3725 Series [9]. "Performance Evaluation of Routing Protocol RIPv2, OSPF, EIGRP with BGP".…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

ANALISIS KINERJA REDISTRIBUSI ROUTING PROTOKOL DINAMIK (Studi Kasus : RIP, EIGRP, IS-IS)

Mukmin

Negara

2019

klik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Each routing protocol has different algorithms and metrics in determining the best path on a network. Differences 1) Applications that only run on routing protocols 2) hardware from various vendors 3) Networks with different routing areas or domains. Some aspects that become a reference for some routing protocols that are issued from data sent and lost in the process of sending data (packet loss), speed in sending data (delay), as well as the ability of some routing protocols in choosing the closest distance when sending data transmission packets. Routing protocol characteristics. This study studies analyzing routing redistribution in dynamic routing protocols, in order to find out which routing protocols perform better in networks that are different from autonomous systems (AS) with measurement parameters of Throughput, Delay and Packet Loss.Keywords : EIGRP, IS-IS, Redistribution Routing, RIP, Routing ProtocolSetiap protokol routing memiliki algoritma dan metrik yang berbeda-beda dalam menentukan jalur terbaik pada sebuah jaringan. Perbedaan karakteristik tersebut menimbulkan beberapa masalah 1)aplikasi yang hanya berjalan pada protokol routing tertentu 2)hardware dari berbagai vendor 3)Jaringan dengan area atau domain routing berbeda. Beberapa aspek yang menjadi acuan suatu protokol routing diantaranya dari segi data yang terkirim dan hilang dalam proses pengiriman data (packet loss), kecepatan dalam pengiriman data (delay), juga kemampuan suatu protokol routing dalam memilih jarak terdekat bahkan jalur terbaik dalam pengiriman paket data. Perbedaan karakteristik protokol routing tersebut tersebut dapat diselesaikan dengan cara menggunakan redistribusi routing. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perbandingan redistribusi routing pada protokol routing dinamik, guna mencari tahu protokol routing mana yang lebih baik kinerjanya dalam jaringan yang berbeda autonomous system (AS) dengan parameter pengukuran Throughput, Delay dan Packet Loss.Kata Kunci : EIGRP, IS-IS, Redistribusi Routing, RIP, Protokol Routing

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

ANALISIS KINERJA REDISTRIBUSI ROUTING PROTOKOL DINAMIK (Studi Kasus : RIP, EIGRP, IS-IS)

Mukmin

Negara

2019

klik

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, some other parameters like Delay, time factor, transmission efficiency is also important to precisely degree the concert of an authentication protocols in VPLS network. In paper [10] evaluated the routing protocols while they also measured combined routing protocols performance in IPv6 network using iperf software which measured the throughput, jitter and packet loss value in a same network's platform. In the paper [11], author scrutinized the performance of Ipv4 and Ipv6 when routing protocols have been utilized in both Ipv4 and Ipv6 virtual networks using GNS3.In this survey conclude that the Smart Analyzer application offers all those features which are not obtainable by existing applications as shown in fig.1 given below:…”

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

SPA: A Smart Packet Analyzer for Network Traffic Analysis on Smartphones

Singh¹,

Kumar²,

Sharma³

et al. 2018

IJCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The intensifying growth of the internet and machinery whether its mobile or computer technology has brought countless good and proficient things for people such as Ecommerce, E-mail, Cloud Computing, Data Sharing, Application and many more but there are also a dark and unseen sides of it such as Network Hacks, Computer hacks, Mobile Breach, Backdoors etc. In today's era, Cybercrime been one of the communal practices made by the computer specialists and is growing swiftly in numbers. Network monitoring performance of mobiles or computer are becoming increasingly significant for the security protection within today's organizational, ISP and carriers. There are the numerous tools which are available for network analysis, packet analysis such as Wireshark, Netresec, Termux. In this paper propose system is about an application idea through which user can analyze the network traffic, detect malicious packet, MAC spoofing, ARP spoofing, protocol filtering. Which will assist the user to identify the malicious packet that can cause damage to user's assets.

show abstract

“…However, some other parameters like Delay, time factor, transmission efficiency is also important to precisely measure the performance of an authentication protocols in VPLS network. Paper [ 5] evaluated the routing protocols while they also considered combined routing protocols performance in Ipv6 network using iperf software which measured the throughput, jitter and packet loss value in a same networks platform. After all this result may change with the demand or design of different other computer networks.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As with most complex technologies and requirements for diversity, there's no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to develop networking systems [5]. The necessity and resources of each unique sector will correlate to a different set of networking systems and solutions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%