2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of panelled anaerobic baffle-cum-filter reactor in treating municipal wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the wastewater was clearly representative of municipal wastewaters. The studies performed by Sun et al ( 2016 ) and Renuka et al ( 2016 ) showed similar results. The results showed that ultrasound waves had the high ability on reducing hormones E1 and E2 (Tables 2 and 3 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen, the wastewater was clearly representative of municipal wastewaters. The studies performed by Sun et al ( 2016 ) and Renuka et al ( 2016 ) showed similar results. The results showed that ultrasound waves had the high ability on reducing hormones E1 and E2 (Tables 2 and 3 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In fact, ultrasound waves lead to extensive destruction of organic materials, particularly macromolecules and massive organic materials by the formation of hydroxyl radical and cavitations phenomenon (Budiman and Wu 2016 ; Wu et al 2012 ). E1 and E2 hormones have strong oxidizing properties, so they are easily oxidized by hydroxyl free radicals produced by ultrasound (Renuka et al 2016 ). Also, these compounds are exposed to cavitation (Hotspot) made by ultrasound and they will remove because they have carbon ring of cyclohexane and cyclopentane types and desirable volatility properties (Jia et al 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elimination of a component reduces material cost, whereas replacement with a new component increases the cost of the reactor when compared with a conventional UASB reactor. But in the long run, several advantages could be obtained in terms of reduced hydraulic retention time (HRT) (which in turn reduces pumping cost) and high biomass retention (which increases the efficiency) (Liu et al, 2013; Lo et al, 1994; Renuka et al, 2016). Variation of the labor and maintenance cost depend upon the complexity of modification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to create cross-flow conditions inside the reactor to maintain high biomass concentration in this study, cross-flow packing was developed and utilized in each compartment of the ABR to form a hybrid anaerobic baffled reactor (HABR). The improvement of the structure led to the adherence of the microorganisms on the packing to form biofilms, and further increased the microbial richness and diversity [18,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%