EFTF-2010 24th European Frequency and Time Forum 2010
DOI: 10.1109/eftf.2010.6533694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of NIM GPS receivers in use for time transfer with PTB

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, mode 1 was proved for NIM receivers to be better than mode 2 (see more details in [4]). In other words, the two receivers should be In terms of section 2, for the link calibration between NIM and PTB, the reference delays of TR at two timing labs will be measured by SRS SR620…”
Section: Modifications and Improvements Of The Calibration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, mode 1 was proved for NIM receivers to be better than mode 2 (see more details in [4]). In other words, the two receivers should be In terms of section 2, for the link calibration between NIM and PTB, the reference delays of TR at two timing labs will be measured by SRS SR620…”
Section: Modifications and Improvements Of The Calibration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…So far, there are two kinds of operation modes for GPS timing receivers [4] , and in those calibration campaigns of the link between ROA and PTB [2] and the link between PTB and METAS [3] , GTR50 that is operated in mode 2 was used as TR for the link calibration. However, mode 1 was proved for NIM receivers to be better than mode 2 (see more details in [4]).…”
Section: Modifications and Improvements Of The Calibration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A self-developed traveling GPS (Global Positioning System) receiver of NIM, NIM acronym IMEU, which is based on a JAVAD E_GGD receiver has been assembled and operated as traveling GPS receiver (TR) at PTB and NIM in succession for that purpose. After the suitability for the purpose of the IMEU receiver had been verified [1], the method using it for link calibrations has been developed [2]. The operation mode of IMEU differs from that of the GTR50 receiver which was used in previous successful calibration campaigns [3,4].…”
Section: Forewordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reference delays RD1 and RD2 of TR were measured by SR620 Time Interval Counters (TIC), the difference RDD of RD1 and RD2 that were calculated according to(1) and the corresponding standard deviations of the measurements are givenin TABLE II.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%