A new primary frequency standard, the atomic caesium fountain CSF1, has been put into operation at the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB). 133 Cs atoms are cooled in a magneto-optical trap and in optical molasses. They are launched to a height of 39 cm above the microwave cavity centre. The resulting Ramsey resonance signal has a full-width half-maximum linewidth (FWHM) of 0.88 Hz. The rst uncertainty evaluation yields a relative 1 frequency uncertainty of 1.4 10-15. The short-term relative frequency instability of the CSF1 for averaging time is typically 3.5 10-13 (/s)-1/2 , dictated by the available quartz oscillator as the local frequency source.

(PTB) operate cold-atom based primary frequency standards which are capable of realizing the SI second with a relative uncertainty of 1 × 10 −15 or even below. These institutes performed an intense comparison campaign of selected frequency references maintained in their laboratories during about 25 days in October/November 2004. Active hydrogen maser reference standards served as frequency references for the institutes' fountain frequency standards. Three techniques of frequency (and time) comparisons were employed. Two-way satellite time and frequency transfer (TWSTFT) was performed in an intensified measurement schedule of 12 equally spaced measurements per day. The data of dual-frequency geodetic Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers were processed to yield an ionosphere-free linear combination of the code observations from both GPS frequencies, typically referred to as GPS TAI P3 analysis. Last but not least, the same GPS raw data were separately processed, allowing GPS carrier-phase (GPS CP) based frequency comparisons to be made. These showed the lowest relative frequency instability at short averaging times of all the methods. The instability was at the level of 1 part in 10 15 at one-day averaging time using TWSTFT and GPS CP. The GPS TAI P3 analysis is capable of giving a similar quality of data after averaging over two days or longer. All techniques provided the same mean frequency difference between the standards involved within the 1σ measurement uncertainty of a few parts in 10 16. The frequency differences between the three fountains of IEN (IEN-CsF1), NPL (NPL-CsF1) and OP (OP-FO2) were evaluated. Differences lower than the 1σ measurement uncertainty were observed between NPL and OP, whereas the IEN fountain deviated by about 2σ from the other two fountains.

We demonstrate the capability of accurate time transfer using optical fibers over long distances utilizing a dark fiber and hardware which is usually employed in two-way satellite time and frequency transfer (TWSTFT). Our time transfer through optical fiber (TTTOF) system is a variant of the standard TWSTFT by employing an optical fiber in the transmission path instead of free-space transmission of signals between two ground stations through geostationary satellites. As we use a dark fiber there are practically no limitations to the bandwidth of the transmitted signals so that we can use the highest chip-rate of the binary phase-shift modulation available from the commercial equipment. This leads to an enhanced precision compared to satellite time transfer where the occupied bandwidth is limited for cost reasons. The TTTOF system has been characterized and calibrated in a common clock experiment at PTB, and the combined calibration uncertainty is estimated as 74 ps. In a second step the remote part of the system was operated at Leibniz Universität Hannover, Institut für Quantenoptik (IQ) separated by 73 km from PTB in Braunschweig. In parallel, a GPS time transfer link between Braunschweig and Hannover was established, and both links connected a passive hydrogen maser at IQ with the reference time scale UTC(PTB) maintained in PTB. The results obtained with both links agree within the 1-σ uncertainty of the GPS link results, which is estimated as 0.72 ns. The fiber link exhibits a nearly 10-fold improved stability compared to the GPS link, and assessment of its performance has been limited by the properties of the passive maser.

Local position invariance ͑LPI͒ is part of the more general Einstein equivalence principle ͑EEP͒ which in turn is a foundation of Einstein's theory of general relativity. The EEP predicts a dependence of clock rates on the local gravitational potential U. LPI predicts that the gravitational shift is independent of the atomic species involved as a reference in the clock. It can thus be tested by comparing two different kinds of atomic frequency standard in the same time-varying gravitational potential U(t). In our experiment we made use of the time dependence of U(t) due to Earth's annual elliptical orbital motion. U(t)/c 2 varies between Ϯ3.3ϫ10 Ϫ10 (c is the speed of light͒. Comparing a cesium atomic fountain frequency standard with a hydrogen maser for about one year allowed us to set an upper limit on a possible frequency variation of 2.1ϫ10 Ϫ5 of this amount. Compared to previous similar experiments the limit of the notional violation of LPI was reduced by a factor of more than 30.

Two-way satellite time and frequency transfer (TWSTFT) has become an important technical component in the process of the realization of International Atomic Time. To employ the full potential of the technique, especially for true time transfer, a dedicated calibration is necessary. This consists of the calibration either of the operational link at large, including every component involved, or of the involved ground stations' internal delays only. Both modes were successfully employed by circulating and operating a portable reference station between the sites involved. In this paper, we summarize the theoretical background for the different calibration modes applied and report examples of results from the 13 calibration campaigns performed up to now in Europe and between Europe and the United States. In all of these exercises, estimated uncertainties around 1 ns were achieved. Consecutive campaigns showed a very good reproducibility at the nanosecond level. Additionally, we address and briefly discuss sources that possibly limit the uncertainty for true time transfer employing TWSTFT.