2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1726-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of manufacturing systems based on dependability management indicators—case study: chemical industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Koren and Shpitalni [10] examined the relationship between configuration design and reliability, productivity, quality, scalability, and cost analysis. In another study [20], availability, reliability, and maintenance analysis of a reconfigurable manufacturing system was performed. However, the diagnostics-based analysis of RMS was not performed in different phases of production.…”
Section: B Diagnostic Of Rmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Koren and Shpitalni [10] examined the relationship between configuration design and reliability, productivity, quality, scalability, and cost analysis. In another study [20], availability, reliability, and maintenance analysis of a reconfigurable manufacturing system was performed. However, the diagnostics-based analysis of RMS was not performed in different phases of production.…”
Section: B Diagnostic Of Rmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per the relationships given in eq. (18)(19)(20)(21), the functionality of reconfigurable machines starts producing failed units once the threshold is crossed. Accordingly, in the absence of the distinguishability phase, this threshold is crossed once the detectability phase is elapsed.…”
Section: B Simulation-based Optimization (Sbo) For Stochastic Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this equation, θ represents the DEA efficiency scores for both CCR and BCC models of the manufacturers in the year 2015/2016. The efficiency drivers can include number of outlets, firm nationality, ownership type, mergers and acquisition and experience Gandhi and Shankar, 2014;Glancey, 1998;Rezaie et al, 2009;Thomas et al, 1998;Uyar et al, 2013;Ramanathan, 2008, 2009). The variables in the DEA model have been selected from balance sheets, as well as, profit and loss statement.…”
Section: Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This becomes a legitimate problem because perception gap self-evidently relates to supply chain performance and especially the level of cohesiveness and integration. Performance measurement is an essential concept in SCM, and is used not only for supplier evaluation, but also for supplier selection [11][12][13][14]. However, there does not exist a research that frames and measures the perception gap regarding the importance of the various performance criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%