2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40999-016-0131-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of In-Plan Irregular RC Frame Buildings Based on Turkish Seismic Code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both of the RC frames have 5 bays and the width of the bay is 5m. The reason for selecting 5 and 7 story buildings is the motivation of a few studies from the literature [38,39]. Two different concrete compressive strengths were considered C20 and C25.…”
Section: Description Of Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of the RC frames have 5 bays and the width of the bay is 5m. The reason for selecting 5 and 7 story buildings is the motivation of a few studies from the literature [38,39]. Two different concrete compressive strengths were considered C20 and C25.…”
Section: Description Of Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is subjected to seismic loading in both earthquake directions as described in TEC 2018. 2 A basic analysis is conducted to measure the structure's response to the first three oscillation modes, maximum lateral drifts and column capacities for axial force and bending moment.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of the Finite Element Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this observation, real behaviour of these structures considering the irregularity and their capacity to resist the action of earthquake needs to be evaluated. Recently, many investigations were conducted to obtain more reliable seismic response of in-plan irregular buildings using nonlinear method [3][4][5][6][7]. So, this study aims to evaluation the effect of in-plan irregularity on the seismic performance of the RC buildings using nonlinear static procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%