2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/dasc.2018.8569228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Evaluation of Conflict-Free Trajectory Taxiing in Airport Ramp Area Using Fast-Time Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Okuniek [26] [27] et al applied the management tool Taxi Routing for Aircraft: Creation and Controlling (TRACC) to trajectory-based ramp traffic management, where TRACC generated conflict-free aircraft trajectories in a congested ramp area.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Okuniek [26] [27] et al applied the management tool Taxi Routing for Aircraft: Creation and Controlling (TRACC) to trajectory-based ramp traffic management, where TRACC generated conflict-free aircraft trajectories in a congested ramp area.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the state of art of automatic CD&R, most of the researchers focus on the cruising phase of the aircraft [20,21], ground taxing [22,23], and conflicts between taking off aircraft and landing aircraft on the intersecting runway [24,25] and CD&R between unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) [26,27], but the flight speed and maneuvering mode of drones are very different from civil aircraft. There are also CD&R algorithms such as OCRA [28,29] that could be applied to MMDP problems with an extremely large magnitude of agents, the speed of the agent can be reduced to zero in the OCRA model, and each agent is only responsible for the half of the minimum safety interval, which is not applicable to CD&R in civil aviation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow-based macroscopic simulation environments like FACET (NASA) [1], SAAM (EU-ROCONTROL) [2], TAAM [3], Bluesky [4], and TOMATO [5], which primarily focus on network effects, are widely used, though they can lack higher levels of detail concerning ground operations. On the other hand, highly detailed simulations, such as the discrete event-based SIMMOD [6] or the Surface Operations Simulator and Scheduler (NASA) [7], which are applied for capacity assessments at airports or gate allocation problems, do not cover network effects. In contrast to flow-based methods, they focus on a specific airport with its surrounding airspace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%