21st Annual IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications 2010
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2010.5671892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of channel coding for Gbps 60-GHz OFDM-based wireless communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is assumed that the channel coding compensates residual distortions to achieve a coded bit error rate (BER) below 10 26 or a packet error rate below 10%. This assumption is supported by simulations [16].…”
Section: C) Link-budget Analysissupporting
confidence: 57%
“…It is assumed that the channel coding compensates residual distortions to achieve a coded bit error rate (BER) below 10 26 or a packet error rate below 10%. This assumption is supported by simulations [16].…”
Section: C) Link-budget Analysissupporting
confidence: 57%
“…We choose the frequency-domain equalization (FDE), ideal synchronization and ideal channel estimation in this simulation chain. Differing from performance evaluation in [5], this paper considers the effect of hardware impairments, including phase noise and non-linear distortion of power amplifier (NLPA), incurred by ultra-high carrier frequency and ultra-wide bandwidth [9]. The CC(171,133), RS(255,239)-CC(171,133) and LDPC(672,336) are considered as channel coding schemes for the 60GHz SC-PHY WPAN System, referring to ECMA 387 standard, IEEE 802.15.3c standard and IEEE 802.11ad Standard [8].…”
Section: Sc Physical Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The channel coding schemes constitute a critical aspect for 60GHz WPAN systems, and it is widely studied in [3], [4] and [5]. The frame-error rate performance evaluation of LDPC and convolutional codes (CC) in 60GHz OFDM-based wireless systems has been presented in [5], which shows LDPC obtains higher coding gain (about 1dB in line-of-sight (LOS) channel and over 2dB in non-line-of-sight (NLOS) channel compared to CC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is straightforward to use parallel Viterbi decoding in the receiver baseband. However, it has been shown in [4,5] that parallel Viterbi decoders in the receiver baseband result in massive hardware complexity and power consumption. The problem will become more severe if a higher decoding throughput is targeted (i.e., 10 Gbps) for a battery powered user terminal in the future [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%