2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aime.2020.100004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance evaluation of an image-based measurement method used to determine the geometric errors of cone-beam CT instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adjustments for performing dimensional measurement tasks in a ZEISS Xradia Versa instrument can be implemented through the MTX workflow, before scanning workpieces of interest, in a weekly or daily basis. Since strategies for making geometrical distortion corrections in X-ray detectors [5,6,7,8] and image scale corrections [7,9,10,11,12] are well documented in recent literature, no further expansion on these topics are presented in this article. This paper is focused on the evaluation of XRM measurement performance, via MTX, when dimensioning distances in a multi-sphere standard.…”
Section: Measurement Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjustments for performing dimensional measurement tasks in a ZEISS Xradia Versa instrument can be implemented through the MTX workflow, before scanning workpieces of interest, in a weekly or daily basis. Since strategies for making geometrical distortion corrections in X-ray detectors [5,6,7,8] and image scale corrections [7,9,10,11,12] are well documented in recent literature, no further expansion on these topics are presented in this article. This paper is focused on the evaluation of XRM measurement performance, via MTX, when dimensioning distances in a multi-sphere standard.…”
Section: Measurement Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baldo et al [17] described the experimental investigation of the geometric errors of a cone-beam CT system using an imagebased measurement method to map them. Special attention was given to the evaluation of the effectiveness of the measurement method itself to detect the geometric errors, by properly designing the experiments and using statistical techniques such as the analysis of means and analysis of ranges, which combine the graphic power of average and range chart with the sensitivity of the analysis of variance.…”
Section: Outcomes Of Other Collaborative Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying concept is to minimize the reprojection error, which is a measure for the difference between the measured 2D coordinates of the projected sphere midpoints in the detector image and the calculated ones setting up an analytical formula for the forward projection. Investigations that are based on this methodology can be found in [3][4][5][6]. Geometry calibration based on spherical markers is also relevant for CT systems that have a high degree of geometric freedom and thus are able to perform 3D scan trajectories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the Deng correction according to (1) was applied e.g. in [3,4], it was not used in [5] as no clear improvements were observed. One problem of equation ( 1) is that it is quite sensitive to errors from the ellipse detection, especially for small values of c. Lüthi et al [6] and Kang et al [7] used equation ( 2) that is more stable but needs the sphere radius and the axial distance from the source x 0 as additional input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%