1996
DOI: 10.1080/13528165.1996.10871466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Epistemology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Butler 1993;Braidotti 1994;Huxley and Witts 1996;Carlson 1996;George 1996). In line with this theoretical turn, we can see that a common trait in many studies of different masculinities is that "the body" is generally seen as a fundamental feature in forming masculine subjectivity (cf.…”
Section: Technology Embodiment and Social Continuitymentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Butler 1993;Braidotti 1994;Huxley and Witts 1996;Carlson 1996;George 1996). In line with this theoretical turn, we can see that a common trait in many studies of different masculinities is that "the body" is generally seen as a fundamental feature in forming masculine subjectivity (cf.…”
Section: Technology Embodiment and Social Continuitymentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In a number of disciplines, particularly gender theory and performance theory, there has been a revival of interest over the last ten to fifteen years in the noncognitive dimension of embodiment, partly reconfiguring what counts as thought and knowledge (cf. Butler 1993;Braidotti 1994;Huxley and Witts 1996;Carlson 1996;George 1996). In line with this theoretical turn, we can see that a common trait in many studies of different masculinities is that "the body" is generally seen as a fundamental feature in forming masculine subjectivity (cf.…”
Section: Technology Embodiment and Social Continuitymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Ontologically, the traditional hierarchy that privileges text over lived experience has been reversed in recent years as scrutiny increasingly falls on performance practice (George 1996). Working within academia, it is now possible to generate new theory, which can be of true practical value to artists, critics, funding bodies, and scholars in the future.…”
Section: Methodological Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%