2001
DOI: 10.17487/rfc3135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Enhancing Proxies Intended to Mitigate Link-Related Degradations

Abstract: This document is a survey of Performance Enhancing Proxies (PEPs) often employed to improve degraded TCP performance caused by characteristics of specific link environments, for example, in satellite, wireless WAN, and wireless LAN environments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
257
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 431 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
257
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, methods to implicitly distinguish corruption from congestion have, thus far, not been successful [10,16]. However, Performance Enhancing Proxies (PEPs) [12] have been shown to improve TCP performance [7], but break the end-to-end semantics of the transport layer connection. In addition, PEPs that require intrusive header inspection are not able to impact encrypted traffic (e.g., traffic utilizing IPsec [26]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, methods to implicitly distinguish corruption from congestion have, thus far, not been successful [10,16]. However, Performance Enhancing Proxies (PEPs) [12] have been shown to improve TCP performance [7], but break the end-to-end semantics of the transport layer connection. In addition, PEPs that require intrusive header inspection are not able to impact encrypted traffic (e.g., traffic utilizing IPsec [26]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we limit ourselves to cite TCP Hybla [29] and TCP-Westwood [6] as transport protocols, even if this could be further extended. An alternative approach, widely adopted in satellite environments, is represented by 'accelerators' or performance enhancing proxies (PEPs) [30], which basically rely on the introduction of intermediate agents at transport layer. In a future perspective, the delay/disruptive tolerant networking (DTN) architecture [31] may represent an interesting solution not only for deep space communications, but also for the most challenging satellite networks.…”
Section: Ucit: a Tool For Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each section uses a transport protocol optimized for such specific environment. Connection splitting solutions and more generic group of performance enhancement proxies (PEPs) [14] achieve good level of TCP performance improvement. However, they violate TCP semantics and end-to-end principle of Internet protocol design (i.e.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%