2020
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2020.2983912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance-Complexity Tradeoffs of Concatenated FEC for Higher-Order Modulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the structural delay, this decoding delay depends on the decoder realization and can be reduced by faster hardware. A comprehensive comparison of MLC with BICM in terms of complexity can, e.g., be found in [36], [37].…”
Section: E Comparison With Non-binary Codes and Latency Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the structural delay, this decoding delay depends on the decoder realization and can be reduced by faster hardware. A comprehensive comparison of MLC with BICM in terms of complexity can, e.g., be found in [36], [37].…”
Section: E Comparison With Non-binary Codes and Latency Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A data stream encoded by the inner spatially-coupled repeat accumulate code is assigned to the low-reliability bit-levels of the constellation symbols and decoded by the two-stage MSD, while the remaining data stream bypass the inner code and are assigned to the high-reliability bit-levels of the constellation symbols. The comparison between the MSD-based MLC and BICM approach for various M-QAM modulation formats is done in [29], where the complexity-optimized soft-decision LDPC code is concatenated with the hard-decision staircase code, as in [19]. At data rate of 4.68 (bits/symbol) and applying 64-QAM modulation, the MLC scheme of [29] results in a coding gain of up to 0.4 dB or complexity savings of 60%, when compared with the BICM.…”
Section: Multilevel Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison between the MSD-based MLC and BICM approach for various M-QAM modulation formats is done in [29], where the complexity-optimized soft-decision LDPC code is concatenated with the hard-decision staircase code, as in [19]. At data rate of 4.68 (bits/symbol) and applying 64-QAM modulation, the MLC scheme of [29] results in a coding gain of up to 0.4 dB or complexity savings of 60%, when compared with the BICM.…”
Section: Multilevel Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations