2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2004.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison with effect of door opening on variable and fixed frequency refrigerators/freezers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative energy lost due to fridge openings is about 7 % to 30 % of the total energy consumption, this figure being higher for non-efficient cold appliances [17,18,19,20].…”
Section: Modeling Of Door Openingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative energy lost due to fridge openings is about 7 % to 30 % of the total energy consumption, this figure being higher for non-efficient cold appliances [17,18,19,20].…”
Section: Modeling Of Door Openingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies focused on ambient temperatures and internal compartment temperatures, which are said to be crucial factors [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Also the number of door openings was in the center of interest of different previous studies [20][21][22][23][24]. However, most of the aforementioned studies were limited to investigate the influence of one single variable on refrigerators' energy consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frozen food is a case of multiple products that have varying processing times. The interruption costs of freezing are mainly from the cost of energy consumption (Liu, Chang, & Lin, 2004) and the food quality (Li & Sun, 2002). That is because freezing is one of the most energy consuming processes (Chourot, Macchi, Fournaison, & Guilpart, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%