2002 IEEE International Conference on Personal Wireless Communications
DOI: 10.1109/icpwc.2002.1177278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researches [7,8] have compared the performance among these routing strategies and have shown that protocols using the on-demand strategy outperform those using other routing strategies. Moreover, in MANETs, a wireless link may be broken due to nodes mobility or out of power, and then causes MANETs unreliable and inefficient.…”
Section: Manet Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researches [7,8] have compared the performance among these routing strategies and have shown that protocols using the on-demand strategy outperform those using other routing strategies. Moreover, in MANETs, a wireless link may be broken due to nodes mobility or out of power, and then causes MANETs unreliable and inefficient.…”
Section: Manet Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DSR is intended for networks in which the mobile nodes move at a moderate speed and the network is relatively small [9,16]. Additionally, DSR allows nodes to keep multiple routes to a destination in their route cache [12,17]. When a link on a route is broken, the source node can check its route cache for another route.…”
Section: Review On Network Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional routing algorithms are therefore insufficient for ad-hoc networks. Several researchers have done the qualitative and quantitative analysis of ad hoc routing protocols by means of different performance metrics [ 5,6,8 ]. Researcher Community has broadly classified the routing protocols into two categories [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%