2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance comparison of new generation HCV core antigen test versus HCV RNA test in management of hepatitis C virus infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate excellent diagnostic performance and concordance for detecting HCVcAg in plasma when compared to HCV RNA with a sensitivity of 98.1% (95% CI: 90%‐100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 93%‐100%). This is comparable to previous studies; in a bivariate analysis by Freiman et al the pooled sensitivity was 93.4% (95% CI: 90.1%‐96.4%) and pooled specificity was 98.8% (95% CI: 90.1%‐96.4%) and a retrospective large screening cohort by Van Tilborg et al demonstrated a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI: 86‐98) with a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 94%‐100%) . Our data build on previous recommendations for HCVcAg as an alternative to HCV nucleic acid testing (NAT) for determining active infection …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results indicate excellent diagnostic performance and concordance for detecting HCVcAg in plasma when compared to HCV RNA with a sensitivity of 98.1% (95% CI: 90%‐100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 93%‐100%). This is comparable to previous studies; in a bivariate analysis by Freiman et al the pooled sensitivity was 93.4% (95% CI: 90.1%‐96.4%) and pooled specificity was 98.8% (95% CI: 90.1%‐96.4%) and a retrospective large screening cohort by Van Tilborg et al demonstrated a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI: 86‐98) with a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 94%‐100%) . Our data build on previous recommendations for HCVcAg as an alternative to HCV nucleic acid testing (NAT) for determining active infection …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Studies in plasma and serum have shown advantages of HCV core antigen assays over viral molecular testing methods, including (a) improved affordability; (b) rapid detection (30 minutes); (c) single platform reflex testing to allow for screening and confirmation; (d) multi‐analyte testing from one sample with a smaller input volume requirement and (e) sample stability at room temperature, reducing the need for cold chain transportation . HCV core antigen also offers the potential to provide an alternative tool for monitoring treatment and post‐treatment relapse …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, first generation antigen tests had soon become unpopular due to their lack of sensitivity [ 7 ]. The chemiluminescent immunoassay based new generation HCV Ag test used in this study has a sensitivity of ≤ 3 fmol/L, offering 16- to 25-fold sensitivity compared to preceding tests [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of HCV cAg in serum reflects the level of viremia to some extent. It has been reported abroad that without consideration of HCV genotypes, HCV RNA was correlated with HCV Ag . Kesli et al revealed that when compared to HCV RNA detection, HCV cAg's sensitivity, specialty, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 96.3%, 100%, 100%, and 89.7%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%