Performance comparison of IPv4 and IPv6 on various windows operating systems

Narayan, Shaneel; Kolahi, Samad S.; Sunarto, Y.; Nguyen, D.D.T.; Mani, P.

doi:10.1109/iccitechn.2008.4803056

Cited by 22 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They conclude that the reduction of the overheads of the system and the application improves the quality of the voice for both IPv6 and IPv4. Shaneel Narayan et al compare in [13] The results show that the percentage of the increased delay is a 67% for IPv4 networks with either NAT or ACLs. For IPv6 network it starts with a 317% increased delay without any additional security and 367% with ACLs.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 90%

Comparative Study of a Router Performance with IPv4 and IPv6 Traffic

Dobrinov¹,

Parra

García

et al. 2016

NPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because of the growth of the number of devices that use the internet, the number of available IPv4 addresses has run out in most parts of the world. IPv6 was created to solve this problem but the migration progress is proceeding at a slower pace that it was expected. This is mostly due to the cost of changing the equipment to one that supports IPv6 and the cost of configuring these devices. Knowing the aspects of a router configuration that are affected by the performance of IPv6 is very important in order to improve the efficiency of IPv6 end facilitate the migration process. In this paper we perform several measures to detect which aspects of the configuration of a bottom and medium range router are affected by IPv6. Two different topologies were used and different combinations of IPv4 and IPv6 traffic are sent. In different test Access Control Lists or IPv6 Routing Extension Headers are used. CPU usage and maximum traffic rate are some evaluated parameters. The router performance is clearly affected by the IPv6 traffic is used, CPU usage increases and the maximum traffic rate decreases.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 90%

Comparative Study of a Router Performance with IPv4 and IPv6 Traffic

Dobrinov¹,

Parra

García

et al. 2016

NPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…IP Traffic [7] was selected as the traffic measurement tool for its compatibility with and for its powerful analysis of a wide ran service parameters to acquire accurate importantly it was chosen in order to keep con results produced for IPv4 and IPv6 performa XP [6]. Considering UDP throughput for IPv6, performed comparatively better than XP wi difference of 10.3 Mbps (58.8 Mbps for XP Vista) for 384 byte packet size.…”

Section: Data Generation and Traffic Measmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This was done in order to throughput and RTT without the use of a router. It was also done so as to maintain similar research shown in the past including t done on Windows XP [6]. The computer har of an Intel® Core™ 2 Duo 6300 1.87 GHz pr GB RAM for the efficient operation of Wi Intel Pro/100 S Desktop Adapter NIC and a Caviar SE 160 GB hard-drive on the two work The operating system installed was Mic Vista (plus Service Pack 1).…”

Section: Network Setupmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 2008, Narayan et al [6] carried out a performance comparison of IPv4 and IPv6 using Windows XP operating system over a network where two clien connected through a standard Category 5e cro study performed an evaluation on IPv4 and I UDP protocols by measuring throughput and packet sizes. Their research concluded that better for TCP and IPv4 performed bette Windows XP.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

UDP Performance Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 on Windows Vista and Windows XP over Fast Ethernet Peer-Peer LAN

Manford

Kolahi

Soorty

et al. 2009

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Technologies &Amp; Applications

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, IPv6 data header is twice in size to that of its predecessor, implying that IPv6 has a higher overhead associated with itthus performance degradation. This additional over varies in size with the data payload size -for example, with no fragmentation of datagrams, a payload of 128 Bytes has performance difference of 10.3%, and for payload of 1408 Bytes the difference is 1.3% approximately [3]. In this paper, IPv4 and IPv6 performance has been compared on two operating systems namely, Windows Vista and Linux Ubuntu.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Evaluation of IPv4 and IPv6 on Windows Vista and Linux Ubuntu

Narayan

Shang

Fan

2009

2009 International Conference on Networks Security, Wireless Communications and Trusted Computing

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-A small network of computing devices that started as ARPANET project in early 1980s is now a worldwide network of devices for billions of users. This global network, the Internet, has become an integral part of worldwide economy and life of individuals. Internet Protocol (IP) v4 is the basic building block of the Internet and has served well, but it has limitations that hinder its growth. The solution is IPv6, which addresses inherent problems of the earlier version. However, due to the increased overhead in IPv6 and its interaction with the operating system that hosts this communication protocol, there may be network performance issues. In this paper, two operating systems namely, Windows Vista and Linux Ubuntu are configured with the two versions of IP and empirically evaluated for performance difference. Performance related metrics like throughput, delay, jitter and CPU usage are empirically measured on a test-bed implementation. The results show that network performance depends not only on IP version and traffic type, but also on the choice of the operating system.

show abstract

Performance comparison of IPv4 and IPv6 on various windows operating systems

Cited by 22 publications

References 12 publications

Comparative Study of a Router Performance with IPv4 and IPv6 Traffic

Comparative Study of a Router Performance with IPv4 and IPv6 Traffic

UDP Performance Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 on Windows Vista and Windows XP over Fast Ethernet Peer-Peer LAN

Performance Evaluation of IPv4 and IPv6 on Windows Vista and Linux Ubuntu

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About