TENCON 2018 - 2018 IEEE Region 10 Conference 2018
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.2018.8650230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison of Indoor Fingerprinting Techniques Based on Artificial Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the corridor experimentation are presented in Table 2. The experimentation results compared to those in [21] show that the proposed method has reduced the positioning error to around 46%.…”
Section: Experimentation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the corridor experimentation are presented in Table 2. The experimentation results compared to those in [21] show that the proposed method has reduced the positioning error to around 46%.…”
Section: Experimentation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed algorithm achieved around 99.64% on floor classification and the location error was between 4 m and 5 m with minimum error 4.15 m which is higher than the positioning error achieved by KNN as shown in Table 4. In addition, the autoencoder model presented in [9,21] applied to this database merely achieved 60% on floor classification. The same observation has been proved as in the first option.…”
Section: Experimentation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Roughly, those methods can be classified into two categories, namely, the received signal feature-based methods, and the propagation time-based methods [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. The received signal strength indicator (RSSI) fingerprint is the most widely adopted feature to indicate position information in favor of its simplicity and accessibility [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Generally, the fingerprint based schemes are conducted in two phases, i.e., an offline phase followed by an online phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is not required to know the exact positions of all APs, which leads to the advantage of deployment flexibility. In the online phase, the target position is estimated by comparing the current RSSI vector to the fingerprint database using the matching algorithms such as the maximum likelihood [15], k-nearest neighbors [16], support vector machine [17], random forest [18], Bayesian network [19], Gaussian process [20] and an artificial neural network [21]. The key system parameters, such as the number of APs, the density of RPs and the time span of signal collection determine the positioning precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%