2015 IEEE 39th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1109/compsac.2015.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance Comparison of Geographic DTN Routing Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The duty-cycle scheduling method tries to make applications last longer by letting nodes sleep for as long as possible and waking them up when a packet is sent to them. In the study field of low duty-cycle networks [16][17][18][19][20][21], the researchers did a thorough analysis of how long it takes for data to travel from a node to a sink in networks where nodes work at different times. And some researchers say that the best choice is to use dynamic forwarding, which takes both the sleeping latency and the link quality into account and always sends the packet to the node with the desired metric [22].…”
Section: Duty-cycled Wsnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duty-cycle scheduling method tries to make applications last longer by letting nodes sleep for as long as possible and waking them up when a packet is sent to them. In the study field of low duty-cycle networks [16][17][18][19][20][21], the researchers did a thorough analysis of how long it takes for data to travel from a node to a sink in networks where nodes work at different times. And some researchers say that the best choice is to use dynamic forwarding, which takes both the sleeping latency and the link quality into account and always sends the packet to the node with the desired metric [22].…”
Section: Duty-cycled Wsnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, when the spray stage is finished, the protocol shifts to the waiting stage. In the waiting stage, every node keeps its message in the buffer until reaching its destination [32]. The advantage of the Spray & Wait protocol is lowering the overhead and buffer overflow by reducing the excessive packet forwarding in networks that exists in the flooding routing protocol like Epidemic.…”
Section: Description Of Dtns Routing Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Routing design is a hot research topic, as a well-performing routing algorithm can deliver messages to the destination node in a short time with minimal overhead. Designing an efficient routing algorithm is a key and challenging problem in DTN [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%