2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance characterization of a quantitative liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometric method for 12 macrolide and lincosamide antibiotics in salmon, shrimp and tilapia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mobile phase consisted of an aqueous solution of formic acid and acetonitrile, and the detection was performed with a triple quadrupole MS/MS combined with an electrospray ionization source in the positive mode. The LOD was 0.5 µg/kg, and recoveries were found between 47% and 99% [68].…”
Section: Extraction Of Macrolidesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The mobile phase consisted of an aqueous solution of formic acid and acetonitrile, and the detection was performed with a triple quadrupole MS/MS combined with an electrospray ionization source in the positive mode. The LOD was 0.5 µg/kg, and recoveries were found between 47% and 99% [68].…”
Section: Extraction Of Macrolidesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The mobile phase consisted of an aqueous solution of formic acid and acetonitrile, and the detection was performed with a triple quadrupole MS/MS combined with an electrospray ionization source in the positive mode. The LOD was 0.5 μg/kg, and recoveries were found between 47% and 99% [68].…”
Section: Extraction Of Macrolidesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…At present, the methods for multi-residue analysis of macrolide antibiotics mainly include high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Clark, Dowling, & Boison, 2009;De La Huebra, Vincent, Bordin, & Rodriguez, 2005;Edder, Coppex, Cominoli, & Corvi, 2002;Lagan a, 2009;Bogialli, Di Corcia, Lagan a, Mastrantoni, & Sergi, 2007;Dickson, 2014;Dickson, O'Byrne, & Chan, 2012;Granja et al, 2009;Horie, Takegami, Toya, & Nakazawa, 2003;Jacobsen, Halling-Sørensen, Ingerslev, & Hansen, 2004;Thompson, Noot, Calvert, & Pernal, 2005;Wang & Leung, 2009;Yang & Carlson, 2004), and capillary electrophoresis (CE) (Deng, Kang, Li, & Xu, 2007a;Deng, Kang, Li, & Xu, 2007b;Liu, Shi, Liu, & Tian, 2010;Tong, Rao, Zhu, Jiang, & Ding, 2009). Compared to HPLC and LC-MS, CE has the virtue of rapid separation and low reagent consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%