2008
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance‐based optimum seismic design of reinforced concrete structures

Abstract: SUMMARYA fully automated design methodology based on nonlinear response history analysis is proposed for the optimum seismic design of reinforced concrete (RC) structures. The conventional trial-and-error process is replaced by a structural optimization algorithm that serves as a search engine capable of locating the most efficient design in terms of cost and performance. Two variations of the proposed design methodology are introduced. The first approach treats the optimum design problem in a deterministic ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transverse reinforcement spacing sc and/or sb take values between 80mm and 300m with a step of 20mm. Longitudinal bar diameters dbc, dbb take values from (12,14,16,18,20,25)mm and transversal bar diameters dbwc, and dbwb from (8,10,12)mm discrete values sets.…”
Section: Design Parameters and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Transverse reinforcement spacing sc and/or sb take values between 80mm and 300m with a step of 20mm. Longitudinal bar diameters dbc, dbb take values from (12,14,16,18,20,25)mm and transversal bar diameters dbwc, and dbwb from (8,10,12)mm discrete values sets.…”
Section: Design Parameters and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early efforts to optimise earthquake resistant structures were based on traditional seismic design approaches. More recent studies investigate optimum performance-based seismic design (PBSD) methodologies that provide better control of structural damage [11][12][13][14]. The author [15] developed optimum seismic designs of RC frames according to traditional [16] and PBSD methodologies [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, such approaches lacked a rigorous probabilistic basis until the emergence of the Cornell-Krawinkler framework [5], adopted by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center. The latter provided a fertile platform for assessing losses, casualties and downtime, which was gradually expanded to be used for design (rather than just for assessment purposes) of buildings and bridges (e.g., [6][7][8]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, iterations are necessary, severely increasing the computational burden as each cycle involves a sequence of re-design and re-analysis, where the latter is a performance-based assessment employing nonlinear static or dynamic analysis procedures. To mitigate the adverse effects of iterations, several researchers introduced numerical optimization techniques in order to hasten converge (e.g., [7][8][9][10]). The aforementioned methods offer considerable gains in efficiency, yet their implementation is beyond the means of most design offices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the paper outlines a Genetic Algorithm (GAs) inspired to the well-known Darwin's "evolution of species" and the assumption of the "survival of the fittest" rule [17]. Although some pioneering applications of these techniques are already available in the field of structural engineering, they are mainly restricted to the design of new structures [18]- [21]]. The following sections summarize the main aspects of the proposed genetic algorithm and its application in the rational design of retrofitting interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%