2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-006-0009-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance-based multiobjective optimum design of steel structures considering life-cycle cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, the total weight of the frame is considered directly proportional to the total construction cost and thus it is the most common choice to be used for the objective function. However, in earthquake engineering practice the term 'optimum' might have a broader meaning including both the direct construction cost and also the future maintenance and damage costs, usually referred as 'life-cycle cost' (see, for example, [18][19][20]). In the methodology proposed, only the direct cost is taken into consideration, while the 'life-cycle cost' of RC structures can be included if the tools presented in the remainder of the paper are appropriately modified.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the total weight of the frame is considered directly proportional to the total construction cost and thus it is the most common choice to be used for the objective function. However, in earthquake engineering practice the term 'optimum' might have a broader meaning including both the direct construction cost and also the future maintenance and damage costs, usually referred as 'life-cycle cost' (see, for example, [18][19][20]). In the methodology proposed, only the direct cost is taken into consideration, while the 'life-cycle cost' of RC structures can be included if the tools presented in the remainder of the paper are appropriately modified.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such problems include the sizing of individual members (sizing optimization problems), the selection of the most efficient placing of structural members (topology optimization) or a combination of both in order to achieve a single or multiple goals at the same time (multiobjective optimization). The existing literature is rich of papers proposing and applying optimization algorithms in structural problems [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78].…”
Section: Application On Structural Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A structural optimization design method based on cost-effectiveness criteria with consideration of seismic performance has been widely applied in the design of steel structures [3][4][5][6][7] and reinforced concrete structures [8][9][10]. In addition, the optimal design method of steel-concrete composite elements and structures has been studied by some researchers [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%