2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance appraisal of various nanofluids during hard machining of AISI 4340 steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the CuO nanoparticles might provide the lessened chip thickness due to the spherical shape of CuO nanoparticles that might offer a cushion effect. This effect explained how the nanoparticles absorbed the abrupt impact that diminished the cutting force fluctuations 33) . Fig.…”
Section: Chip Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, the CuO nanoparticles might provide the lessened chip thickness due to the spherical shape of CuO nanoparticles that might offer a cushion effect. This effect explained how the nanoparticles absorbed the abrupt impact that diminished the cutting force fluctuations 33) . Fig.…”
Section: Chip Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The presence of high percentage of oxygen in Al2O3 caused significant weight percentage found during machining process and leads to improper cooling thus, crater wear and flank wear take place faster. According Das et al, CuO nanofluid has superior behavior compared to the other nanofluids while Al2O3 nanofluid was last in the row [57]. Table 4 Tool wears reduction when using different nanofluids…”
Section: Tool Wearmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Das et al, in their research work; they compared ZnO, CuO, Fe2O3 and Al2O3, nanofluids to measure the reduction in tool wear [57]. They found out that the crater wear occur more in Al2O3 nanofluid than CuO nanofluid due to the high percentage of oxygen presence in Al2O3.…”
Section: Tool Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Today, wide range of hard materials need to be machined due to their high potential in industrial applications (Davim, 2011). Since their machining is difficult compared to conventional materials, many attempts have been made previously (Das, Pradhan, Patel, Das, & Biswal, 2019;Kene & Choudhury, 2019;Sun, Brandt, & Dargusch, 2010). Typically, poor surface roughness and reduced tool life are characterized features of low machinability of hard metals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%